VOOZH

URL: https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-power-profile-linux/4

⇱ AMD EPYC Turin Power Profile Selection Impact On Performance & Efficiency - Phoronix

👁 Phoronix

Articles & Reviews
News Archive
Forums
Premium
Contact
Categories

Computers Display Drivers Graphics Cards Linux Gaming Memory Motherboards Processors Software Storage Operating Systems Peripherals

AMD EPYC Turin Power Profile Selection Impact On Performance & Efficiency

Written by Michael Larabel in Software on 26 February 2025 at 11:00 AM EST. Page 4 of 5. 5 Comments.

👁 DaCapo Benchmark benchmark with settings of Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Engine. Maximum IO Perf - acpi-cpufreq performance was the fastest.

👁 DaCapo Benchmark benchmark with settings of Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Engine. Maximum IO Perf - acpi-cpufreq performance was the fastest.

👁 DaCapo Benchmark benchmark with settings of Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Engine. Maximum IO Perf - acpi-cpufreq performance was the fastest.

👁 DuckDB benchmark with settings of Benchmark: IMDB. Maximum IO Perf - acpi-cpufreq performance was the fastest.

👁 DuckDB benchmark with settings of Benchmark: IMDB. Maximum IO Perf - acpi-cpufreq performance was the fastest.

👁 DuckDB benchmark with settings of Benchmark: IMDB. Maximum IO Perf - acpi-cpufreq performance was the fastest.

👁 GROMACS benchmark with settings of Implementation: MPI CPU, Input: water_GMX50_bare. Default - High Perf - acpi-cpufreq schedutil was the fastest.

👁 GROMACS benchmark with settings of Implementation: MPI CPU, Input: water_GMX50_bare. Default - High Perf - acpi-cpufreq schedutil was the fastest.

👁 GROMACS benchmark with settings of Implementation: MPI CPU, Input: water_GMX50_bare. Default - High Perf - acpi-cpufreq schedutil was the fastest.

👁 TensorFlow benchmark with settings of Device: CPU, Batch Size: 512, Model: ResNet-50. Maximum IO Perf - acpi-cpufreq performance was the fastest.

👁 TensorFlow benchmark with settings of Device: CPU, Batch Size: 512, Model: ResNet-50. Maximum IO Perf - acpi-cpufreq performance was the fastest.

👁 TensorFlow benchmark with settings of Device: CPU, Batch Size: 512, Model: ResNet-50. Maximum IO Perf - acpi-cpufreq performance was the fastest.

For those that may have been curious about the impact of the Power Profile Selection tunable on AMD EPYC 9005 series processors, hopefully this testing proved insightful.

5 Comments - Next Page

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next Page

Cache Aware Scheduling Shows Nice Wins For AMD Zen 5 On PostgreSQL, Valkey, Network Performance

Linux 6.6 LTS To Linux 7.1 Bechmarks: Performance Up 13% On AMD Threadripper Over Three Years

GCC 16 Produces Faster Binaries Than GCC 15, Competitive Race With LLVM Clang 22

Linux 7.1 Features: New NTFS Driver, New Intel + AMD Hardware, Performance Optimizations & Modernization

GCC 16 Compiler Delivering Some Decent Performance Gains Over GCC 15

Linux 7.1 Is Performing Well Overall In Early Benchmarks

Support Phoronix
While Having Ad-Free Browsing,
Single-Page Article Viewing

Legal Disclaimer, Privacy Policy, Cookies | | Contact
Copyright © 2004 - 2026 by Phoronix Media.
All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.