VOOZH about

URL: https://www.phoronix.com/review/corei3-10100-3300x/3

⇱ AMD Ryzen 3 3300X vs. Intel Core i3 10100 In 350+ Benchmarks - Phoronix


👁 Phoronix

AMD Ryzen 3 3300X vs. Intel Core i3 10100 In 350+ Benchmarks

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 12 June 2020 at 09:48 AM EDT. Page 3 of 5. 43 Comments.

👁 Image

For artists / imaging workloads measured by GraphicsMagick, Inkscape, The GIMP, DCRAW, Darktable, RSVG, GEGL, and AVIFENC, the Ryzen 3 3300X was 10% faster.

👁 Image

If interested in OpenJDK Java performance, testing with Bork, DaCapo Bench, Java Gradle Perf, and Renaissance put the Ryzen 3 3300X at nearly 8% faster than the Core i3 10100.

👁 Image

The Ryzen 3 3300X had a huge lead over the i3-10100 in the linear algebra tests of MT-DGEMM and AMG.

👁 Image

For machine learning related workloads with Numpy, DeepSpeech, SciKit-Learn, MLPack, Numenta NAB, PlaidML, Intel oneDNN / MKL-DNN, and Lc0, the Ryzen 3 3300X was more than 20% faster than the Intel competition.

👁 Image

The Ryzen 3 3300X was great with molecular dynamics workloads including NAMD, GROMACS, CP2K, NWCHEM, CloverLeaf, LAMMPS, MiniFE, Lulesh, and Pennant.

👁 Image

Even when looking at the performance of Intel oneAPI software components like Embree, Open Image Denoise, and OpenVKL, the Ryzen 3 3300X was the stronger processor.

👁 Image

Under different productivity workloads including LibreOffice, Octave, Inkscape, GIMP, GEGL, and RSVG, the Ryzen 3 3300X was just under 5% faster.