VOOZH about

URL: https://www.phoronix.com/review/ext4_benchmarks/2

⇱ Real World Benchmarks Of The EXT4 File-System - Phoronix


👁 Phoronix

Real World Benchmarks Of The EXT4 File-System

Written by Michael Larabel in Software on 3 December 2008 at 09:15 AM EST. Page 2 of 9. 100 Comments.

👁 Image

EXT4 is supposed to be faster than its predecessor at removing files, but this wasn't the case with the Bonnie++ 4GB random delete test. Here the number of sustained operations per second had dropped about 15% when changing from EXT3 to EXT4. The fastest file-system was XFS followed by the ReiserFS with a slight lead over EXT3.

👁 Image

The benefits of EXT4 were shown in a 4GB sequential create. EXT4 managed to push a 34% lead over EXT3 and sizable leads over XFS and ReiserFS.

👁 Image

EXT4 had continued to shine through with the 4GB sequential read. XFS managed to outperform EXT4 at reading, but it was by a very slim margin. EXT3 and ReiserFS were nearly 40% slower.

Editor's Note: Red Hat's Eric Sandeen has stated that with the current Bonnie++ tests in this article, the labels are open to misinterpretation. We will be re-conducting the Bonnie++ tests as well as making the result labels more clear within the Phoronix Test Suite.