VOOZH about

URL: https://www.phoronix.com/review/ext4_btrfs_nilfs2/4

⇱ EXT4, Btrfs, NILFS2 Performance Benchmarks - Phoronix


👁 Phoronix

EXT4, Btrfs, NILFS2 Performance Benchmarks

Written by Michael Larabel in Software on 29 June 2009 at 02:00 AM EDT. Page 4 of 7. 38 Comments.

👁 Image

When doubling the tested file-size to 4GB, EXT4 remained in first. The positions were identical to that of the 2GB write performance, except for the Btrfs slightly outdoing XFS. NILFS2 remained the slowest.

👁 Image

Switching from 4GB writes to 4GB reads, the EXT4 file-system was the fastest, again. EXT3 followed in second and in a distant third was XFS. Further behind that was NILFS2 and then finally was Btrfs, which was over twice as slow as EXT4 at this IOzone test.

👁 Image

When testing out the 8GB write performance, to not much of a surprise, EXT4 won. The NILFS2 was the slowest file-system with a speed of 66MB/s compared to Btrfs at 78MB/s and EXT4's great finish with a speed of 99MB/s.