Rusticl vs. Intel Compute Runtime Performance For OpenCL On Battlemage

Written by Michael Larabel in Display Drivers on 26 August 2025 at 12:00 PM EDT. Page 2 of 4. 18 Comments.

With the popular Hashcat advanced password recovery software, the Intel Compute Runtime was consistently delivering the best performance. The Rusticl performance ranged from around half the speed of the Intel Compute Runtime with 7-Zip to achieving around 90% the performance when looking at the SHA-256 algorithm performance.

👁 SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing benchmark with settings of Target: OpenCL, Benchmark: Triad. CR 25.31.34666.3 was the fastest.

👁 SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing benchmark with settings of Target: OpenCL, Benchmark: Max SP Flops. CR 25.31.34666.3 was the fastest.

👁 SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing benchmark with settings of Target: OpenCL, Benchmark: Bus Speed Download. CR 25.31.34666.3 was the fastest.

👁 SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing benchmark with settings of Target: OpenCL, Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback. CR 25.31.34666.3 was the fastest.

For the SHOC heterogeneous compute OpenCL benchmarks, the Intel Compute Runtime maintained a sizable lead across all the different individual benchmarks conducted.

18 Comments - Next Page

Page: 1 2 3 4 Next Page

URL: https://www.phoronix.com/review/intel-battlemage-rusticl/2

⇱ Rusticl vs. Intel Compute Runtime Performance For OpenCL On Battlemage - Phoronix

Rusticl vs. Intel Compute Runtime Performance For OpenCL On Battlemage