VOOZH about

URL: https://www.phoronix.com/review/ubuntu_lucid_kernels/4

⇱ Testing The Different Ubuntu 10.04 Kernels - Phoronix


👁 Phoronix

Testing The Different Ubuntu 10.04 Kernels

Written by Michael Larabel in Software on 14 March 2010 at 08:06 PM EDT. Page 4 of 5. 19 Comments.

👁 Image

The 7-Zip compression performance was close between the three Ubuntu and three mainline kernels with no major differences.

👁 Image

Again, for Parallel BZIP2 compression the kernels did not have much of an impact.

👁 Image

Encrypting a 1GB file using GnuPG did lead to slightly different results between the kernels. Ubuntu's -server kernel was about a second slower than -generic and -preempt, but this was around the same speed for the 2.6.32 and 2.6.33 mainline kernels. The best performance was actually with the mainline 2.6.34-rc1 kernel.

👁 Image

When looking at the IOzone write performance to the high-performance OCZ solid-state drive running with EXT4, the results between the different kernels were most interesting. When comparing the Ubuntu -generic, -server, and -preempt kernels the -preempt kernel speed was almost doubled of the -generic kernel while the -server kernel was 48% faster than -generic. While Ubuntu's -preempt kernel looks good when comparing just the packages available through the Lucid repository, the mainline Linux 2.6.32.9 kernel upped the write speed by an additional 15% compared to 2.6.32-16-preempt. The speeds rise even higher with the 2.6.33 and 2.6.34-rc1 kernels.