VOOZH about

URL: https://www.phoronix.com/review/zfs_ext4_btrfs/2

⇱ Benchmarking ZFS On FreeBSD vs. EXT4 & Btrfs On Linux - Phoronix


👁 Phoronix

Benchmarking ZFS On FreeBSD vs. EXT4 & Btrfs On Linux

Written by Michael Larabel in Software on 27 July 2010 at 07:00 AM EDT. Page 2 of 4. 237 Comments.

👁 Image

Carrying out 32 threads of 32MB writes, the fastest file-system was once again EXT4 on Ubuntu followed very closely by Btrfs and then came ZFS. Aside from the first test with Gzip compression where ZFS failed to outperform UFS+S/UFS+J, in the rest of the tests so far ZFS is certainly faster than the longstanding UFS competition.

👁 Image

When increasing the write size from 32MB to 128MB but sticking with 32 threads, Btrfs managed to outperform EXT4 by about 15%. ZFS meanwhile still handily beat out the UFS competition -- the Sun/Oracle ZFS was 53% faster than UFS+S and an impressive 2.68x faster than UFS+J.

👁 Image

Finally, at last, ZFS managed to outperform both EXT4 and Ubuntu. With the 32MB random write performance at four threads, ZFS was about 25% faster than Btrfs. EXT4 really struggled with this multi-threaded random write test where it was actually slower than UFS+J and just marginally faster than UFS+S.