VOOZH about

URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc552/

⇱ RFC 552: Single access to standard protocols | RFC Editor


Details

Date published
Authors
  • A.D. Owen
Legacy Stream
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC0552
Formats
Cite this RFC
TXT, XML, BibTeX.

RFC 552: Single access to standard protocols

  • A.D. Owen
Unknown
Network Working Group Buz Owen
RFC # 552 SDAC-TIP
NIC # 17809 13 July, 1973


 Single access to Standard Protocols


Isn't the idea of a single access protocol simple enough that one could
be specified, and a socket reserved for it, before the proposed mail
protocol becomes official? The result would be that MP could be the
first protocol implemented under UULP (or whatever it is to be called),
and the other protocols could be "moved" as soon as any problems in the
official specifications could be worked out, and at the convenience of
implementors.

The single access protocol might have the following commands:

 USER
 PASS
 ACCT
 MAIL
 FTP
 RJS
 DRS (?)
 HELP (?)
 BYE

following Jim White's idea of nested command and reply spaces.

This doesn't address the question of "what is free", or of the
interrelationships between the various protocols, but it doesn't make
those problem any worse, only a little different.










 [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
 [ into the online RFC archives by Alex McKenzie with ]
 [ support from GTE, formerly BBN Corp. 10/99 ]





Owen [Page 1]
RFC 552: Single access to standard protocols
Unknown