Wednesday, September 5, 2012
Changing delay, and hence the order, in a DelayQueue
So I was looking at building a simple object cache that expires the objects after a given time. The obvious mechanism for this is the use the DelayedQueue class from the concurrency package in Java; but I wanted to know if it way possible to update the delay after an object has been added to the queue. Looking at the Delayed interface there didn't seem to be a good reason not to in the docs so I thought it was time to experiment.
So first of all you need to to create an instance of Delayed, this is a very simple implementation that with the switch of a flag you can basically invert the timeout order in the list. (And add a suitable offset so things happen in the right order)
So to test this I created a method that would create a bunch of the DelayedSwap objects and half way through processing the list switch the flag so altering the order of expiration.
So what I was expecting was the elements 1-50 ish written out in the correct order but instead after the swap over the elements are coming out in an arbitrary order quite far away from the request delay time.
So the trick is when you know you are going to modify the delay is to remove and then re-add the element to the queue.
This run produces a more sensible set of results:
I don't think this is a bug in the object itself, as you wouldn't expect a HashTable to orders it's self when the key changes, but I was a little bit surprise by the behaviour.
So first of all you need to to create an instance of Delayed, this is a very simple implementation that with the switch of a flag you can basically invert the timeout order in the list. (And add a suitable offset so things happen in the right order)
static int COUNT=100;
class DelayedSwap implements Delayed, Comparable<Delayed> {
int index = 0;
volatile boolean swap = false;
long starttime;
public DelayedSwap(int index, long starttime) {
super();
this.index = index;
this.starttime = starttime;
}
private long getDelay() {
return (swap ? starttime + (2*COUNT - index) * 100 :
starttime + index * 100) - System.currentTimeMillis();
}
public String toString()
{
return index + " swapped " + swap + " delay " + getDelay();
}
@Override
public long getDelay(TimeUnit unit) {
return unit.convert(getDelay(), TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
}
@Override
public int compareTo(Delayed delayed) {
if (delayed == this)
return 0;
return (int)(getDelay(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS) - delayed.getDelay(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS));
}
}
So to test this I created a method that would create a bunch of the DelayedSwap objects and half way through processing the list switch the flag so altering the order of expiration.
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
final List
So what I was expecting was the elements 1-50 ish written out in the correct order but instead after the swap over the elements are coming out in an arbitrary order quite far away from the request delay time.
1 swapped false delay -19 2 swapped false delay -4 3 swapped false delay -4 4 swapped false delay -4 5 swapped false delay -4 6 swapped false delay -4 7 swapped false delay -4 8 swapped false delay -4 9 swapped false delay -4 10 swapped false delay -4 11 swapped false delay -4 12 swapped false delay -4 13 swapped false delay -4 14 swapped false delay -4 15 swapped false delay -4 16 swapped false delay -4 17 swapped false delay -4 18 swapped false delay -4 19 swapped false delay -4 20 swapped false delay -4 21 swapped false delay -4 22 swapped false delay -4 23 swapped false delay -4 24 swapped false delay -4 25 swapped false delay -4 26 swapped false delay -4 27 swapped false delay -4 28 swapped false delay -4 29 swapped false delay -4 30 swapped false delay -4 31 swapped false delay -4 32 swapped false delay -4 33 swapped false delay -4 34 swapped false delay -4 35 swapped false delay -4 36 swapped false delay -4 37 swapped false delay -4 38 swapped false delay -4 39 swapped false delay -5 40 swapped false delay -4 41 swapped false delay -4 42 swapped false delay -5 43 swapped false delay -4 44 swapped false delay -5 45 swapped false delay -5 46 swapped false delay -5 47 swapped false delay -5 48 swapped false delay -5 49 swapped false delay -5 50 swapped false delay -5 51 swapped true delay -6 94 swapped true delay -4306 96 swapped true delay -4506 87 swapped true delay -3606 91 swapped true delay -4006 97 swapped true delay -4606 95 swapped true delay -4406 98 swapped true delay -4706 92 swapped true delay -4106 82 swapped true delay -3106 80 swapped true delay -2906 90 swapped true delay -3906 93 swapped true delay -4206 74 swapped true delay -2306 99 swapped true delay -4806 70 swapped true delay -1906 69 swapped true delay -1806 66 swapped true delay -1506 83 swapped true delay -3206 62 swapped true delay -1107 61 swapped true delay -1007 58 swapped true delay -707 71 swapped true delay -2007 89 swapped true delay -3807 85 swapped true delay -3407 78 swapped true delay -2707 86 swapped true delay -3507 81 swapped true delay -3007 88 swapped true delay -3707 84 swapped true delay -3307 79 swapped true delay -2807 76 swapped true delay -2507 72 swapped true delay -2107 68 swapped true delay -1707 65 swapped true delay -1407 60 swapped true delay -907 57 swapped true delay -608 55 swapped true delay -408 75 swapped true delay -2408 77 swapped true delay -2608 73 swapped true delay -2208 63 swapped true delay -1208 67 swapped true delay -1608 64 swapped true delay -1308 59 swapped true delay -808 56 swapped true delay -508 54 swapped true delay -308 53 swapped true delay -208 52 swapped true delay -108 Process exited with exit code 0.
So the trick is when you know you are going to modify the delay is to remove and then re-add the element to the queue.
// Replacement swap loop
for (DelayedSwap d : delayed) {
if (dq.remove(d))
{
d.swap = true;
dq.add(d);
}
}
This run produces a more sensible set of results:
1 swapped false delay -4 2 swapped false delay -8 3 swapped false delay -14 4 swapped false delay -8 5 swapped false delay -4 6 swapped false delay -4 7 swapped false delay -4 8 swapped false delay -4 9 swapped false delay -4 10 swapped false delay -4 11 swapped false delay -4 12 swapped false delay -4 13 swapped false delay -4 14 swapped false delay -4 15 swapped false delay -4 16 swapped false delay -4 17 swapped false delay -4 18 swapped false delay -8 19 swapped false delay -4 20 swapped false delay -4 21 swapped false delay -4 22 swapped false delay -4 23 swapped false delay -4 24 swapped false delay -4 25 swapped false delay -4 26 swapped false delay -4 27 swapped false delay -4 28 swapped false delay -4 29 swapped false delay -4 30 swapped false delay -4 31 swapped false delay -4 32 swapped false delay -4 33 swapped false delay -4 34 swapped false delay -4 35 swapped false delay -4 36 swapped false delay -4 37 swapped false delay -4 38 swapped false delay -4 39 swapped false delay -5 40 swapped false delay -5 41 swapped false delay -5 42 swapped false delay -4 43 swapped false delay -4 44 swapped false delay -5 45 swapped false delay -5 46 swapped false delay -5 47 swapped false delay -5 48 swapped false delay -5 49 swapped false delay -5 50 swapped false delay -5 99 swapped true delay -5 98 swapped true delay -5 97 swapped true delay -11 96 swapped true delay -1 95 swapped true delay -5 94 swapped true delay -9 93 swapped true delay -5 92 swapped true delay -5 91 swapped true delay -5 90 swapped true delay -5 89 swapped true delay -5 88 swapped true delay -5 87 swapped true delay -5 86 swapped true delay -5 85 swapped true delay -5 84 swapped true delay -5 83 swapped true delay -5 82 swapped true delay -5 81 swapped true delay -5 80 swapped true delay -5 79 swapped true delay -5 78 swapped true delay -5 77 swapped true delay -5 76 swapped true delay -5 75 swapped true delay -5 74 swapped true delay -5 73 swapped true delay -5 72 swapped true delay -6 71 swapped true delay -5 70 swapped true delay -5 69 swapped true delay -5 68 swapped true delay -5 67 swapped true delay -5 66 swapped true delay -5 65 swapped true delay -5 64 swapped true delay -5 63 swapped true delay -6 62 swapped true delay -5 61 swapped true delay -6 60 swapped true delay -6 59 swapped true delay -6 58 swapped true delay -6 57 swapped true delay -6 56 swapped true delay -6 55 swapped true delay -6 54 swapped true delay -6 53 swapped true delay -6 52 swapped true delay -6 51 swapped true delay -6 Process exited with exit code 0.
I don't think this is a bug in the object itself, as you wouldn't expect a HashTable to orders it's self when the key changes, but I was a little bit surprise by the behaviour.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment