Competitor Review Teardown β Instant Battle-Card
Pricing
Pay per usage
Competitor Review Teardown β Instant Battle-Card
Turn rivals' App Store reviews into a ranked battle-card: top complaints (with quotes + %), top praises, most-requested features, switch-trigger quotes, sentiment trend, and ad angles. The analysis, not a 500-row data dump. Deterministic, no LLM, no API keys.
Pricing
Pay per usage
Rating
0.0
(0)
Developer
Actor stats
0
Bookmarked
2
Total users
1
Monthly active users
9 days ago
Last modified
Categories
Share
Stop reading 500 reviews by hand. Drop in your competitors β get a ranked battle-card you can act on today.
This Actor pulls a competitor's public reviews and runs a deterministic analysis engine over them β no LLM, no API keys, no per-run AI cost β and returns a battle-card, not a data dump:
- π΄ Top complaints, ranked by frequency, each with the % of unhappy reviewers who mention it and verbatim quotes
- π’ Top praises (what you'll be measured against)
- π‘ Most-requested features (the roadmap gaps your competitor is ignoring)
- πͺ Switch-trigger quotes β the exact words people use when they cancel or leave
- π Sentiment over time (is the competitor getting better or worse?)
- π― Ready-to-use ad angles templated from the top complaints
How it works
- Paste one or more competitors (App Store app URLs or IDs).
- The Actor fetches up to ~500 recent reviews per competitor from the public Apple App Store RSS feed.
- A deterministic NLP engine clusters reviews into product themes (pricing, bugs, support, UX, performance, features, β¦), splits complaints vs praise by star rating, ranks them, and pulls representative quotes.
- You get one clean battle-card record per competitor (plus a cross-competitor comparison when you give it 2+).
What you get (output)
One dataset record per competitor:
{"competitor": "Duolingo","reviewsAnalyzed": 300,"avgRating": 3.88,"ratingDistribution": { "1": 31, "2": 18, "3": 22, "4": 40, "5": 189 },"topComplaints": [{ "theme": "Pricing & billing", "mentions": 18, "pctOfReviews": 64.3,"sampleQuotes": ["Way too expensive for what it does.", "Charged me twiceβ¦"] }],"topPraises": [ { "theme": "Ease of use / UI", "mentions": 41, "sampleQuotes": ["β¦"] } ],"mostRequestedFeatures": [ { "request": "wish there was an option for Mexican Spanish", "count": 3 } ],"switchTriggers": [ { "quote": "cancelled my subscription afterβ¦", "count": 5 } ],"sentimentTrend": [ { "month": "2026-05", "avgRating": 3.7, "reviews": 88 } ],"adAngles": ["Tired of Duolingo's pricing problems? 64% of their unhappy reviewers complain about it β here's the switch."]}
Input
| Field | What it does |
|---|---|
| Competitors | One per line β App Store app URLs (https://apps.apple.com/us/app/.../id570060128) or just the numeric ID. Leave empty for a 2-app demo. |
| App Store country | Two-letter storefront for the review locale (default us). |
| Max reviews per competitor | Up to ~500 (default 300). |
Pricing
Pay-per-event: a small flat actor-start fee, then one charge per competitor battle-card produced. You pay for the finished analysis, not per review β and a competitor with no findable reviews is never charged.
Who it's for
- Product marketers building battle-cards and switch campaigns
- Founders / PMs mining a rival's reviews for roadmap gaps
- Growth / paid-ads teams who need ad angles grounded in real customer language
- App developers sizing up the competition before a launch
What it is not
- It is not a raw review scraper β it returns the analysis, not 500 rows to read yourself.
- It does not use an LLM, so output is deterministic and reproducible (and free of hallucinated "insights").
- v1 covers the Apple App Store. Google Play and Trustpilot (which sits behind Cloudflare and needs a residential proxy) are on the roadmap.
Notes
- 100% public data via the official Apple iTunes RSS feed β no login, no key.
- Built and maintained by apify.com/bikram07.
