GDPval-AA v2 Leaderboard
Publication
View on arXivGDPval: Evaluating AI Model Performance on Real-World Economically Valuable Tasks
GDPval-AA v2
GDPval-AA v2 Elo
GDPval-AA v2 Leaderboard
Cost
GDPval-AA v2 Leaderboard: Cost per Task
Average cost per task in the evaluation. Costs are split by input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token pricing where canonical token counts are available.
Elo ComparisonsNew
GDPval-AA v2: Elo vs. Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, ๐ยณ-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.
Token Usage
GDPval-AA v2 Leaderboard: Output Tokens per Task
The average number of answer and reasoning tokens produced per benchmark task in this evaluation.
Average Turns
GDPval-AA v2: Average Turns per Task
Elo vs. Release Date
GDPval-AA v2: Elo vs. Release Date
GDPval-AA v2 Leaderboard
Creator | Name | Elo | CI | Release Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback) | 1783 | -24 / +24 | Jun 2026 | |
| 2 | Claude Opus 4.8 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) | 1615 | -23 / +23 | May 2026 | |
| 3 | GLM-5.2 (max) | 1524 | -26 / +26 | Jun 2026 | |
| 4 | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) | 1519 | -23 / +23 | Apr 2026 | |
| 5 | GPT-5.5 (xhigh) | 1509 | -22 / +22 | Apr 2026 | |
| 6 | GPT-5.5 (high) | 1486 | -22 / +22 | Apr 2026 | |
| 7 | MiniMax-M3 | 1414 | -22 / +22 | Jun 2026 | |
| 8 | GPT-5.4 (xhigh) | 1409 | -22 / +22 | Mar 2026 | |
| 9 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) | 1400 | -22 / +22 | Feb 2026 | |
| 10 | Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) | 1362 | -22 / +23 | May 2026 | |
| 11 | DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) | 1326 | -22 / +22 | Apr 2026 | |
| 12 | Qwen3.7 Max | 1299 | -22 / +22 | May 2026 | |
| 13 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 1282 | -22 / +22 | Apr 2026 | |
| 14 | GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) | 1278 | -22 / +22 | Apr 2026 | |
| 15 | Kimi K2.6 | 1204 | -21 / +21 | Apr 2026 | |
| 16 | Kimi K2.7 Code | 1203 | -22 / +22 | Jun 2026 | |
| 17 | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) | 1196 | -23 / +23 | Apr 2026 | |
| 18 | GPT-5.4 mini (xhigh) | 1187 | -21 / +21 | Mar 2026 | |
| 19 | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) | 1180 | -21 / +21 | Jun 2026 | |
| 20 | MiniMax-M2.7 | 1177 | -21 / +21 | Mar 2026 | |
| 21 | Muse Spark | 1164 | -21 / +21 | Apr 2026 | |
| 22 | Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) | 1162 | -21 / +21 | Apr 2026 | |
| 23 | Qwen3.6 Plus | 1161 | -21 / +21 | Apr 2026 | |
| 24 | GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) | 1134 | -21 / +21 | Apr 2026 | |
| 25 | GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh) | 1114 | -20 / +20 | Mar 2026 | |
| 26 | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | 1107 | -21 / +21 | Apr 2026 | |
| 27 | Grok 4.3 (high) | 1100 | -21 / +21 | Apr 2026 | |
| 28 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) | 1055 | -21 / +21 | Apr 2026 | |
| 29 | Step 3.7 Flash | 1031 | -20 / +20 | May 2026 | |
| 30 | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | 982 | -21 / +21 | Feb 2026 | |
| 31 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 974 | -21 / +21 | Feb 2026 | |
| 32 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) | 961 | -21 / +21 | Feb 2026 | |
| 33 | Qwen3.7 Plus | 946 | -21 / +21 | Jun 2026 | |
| 34 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | 927 | -21 / +21 | Apr 2026 | |
| 35 | Ring-2.6-1T | 920 | -21 / +21 | May 2026 | |
| 36 | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | 901 | -22 / +22 | Oct 2025 | |
| 37 | Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) | 786 | -23 / +23 | Apr 2026 | |
| 38 | gpt-oss-120b (high) | 779 | -23 / +23 | Aug 2025 | |
| 39 | GPT-5.4 mini (Non-Reasoning) | 757 | -24 / +24 | Mar 2026 | |
| 40 | Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) | 718 | -24 / +24 | Apr 2026 | |
| 41 | GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning) | 716 | -25 / +25 | Mar 2026 | |
| 42 | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) | 666 | -25 / +25 | Mar 2026 | |
| 43 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) | 638 | -25 / +25 | Nov 2025 | |
| 44 | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | 605 | -26 / +26 | Mar 2026 | |
| 45 | gpt-oss-20B (high) | 528 | -27 / +27 | Aug 2025 | |
| 46 | Solar Pro 3 | 468 | -28 / +28 | Apr 2026 | |
| 47 | Granite 4.1 30B | 418 | -31 / +31 | Apr 2026 | |
| 48 | Llama 4 Scout | 86 | -37 / +37 | Apr 2025 | |
| 49 | Llama 4 Maverick | โ11 | -38 / +38 | Apr 2025 |
Example Tasks
Frequently Asked Questions
GDPval-AA v2 is Artificial Analysis' evaluation based on OpenAI's GDPval dataset, which tests AI models on real-world economically valuable tasks across 44 occupations and 9 major industries.
GDPval-AA v2 compares model submissions head-to-head on the same task. For each matchup, the two outputs are anonymized and an LLM judge picks a winner. These blind pairwise results are aggregated into an Elo rating per model.
Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback) has the highest GDPval-AA v2 score, with a GDPval-AA v2 Elo rating of 1,783 among models with published GDPval-AA v2 results. View model
GDPval-AA v2 covers real-world professional tasks across a range of occupations and industries, producing outputs such as documents, spreadsheets, slides, and diagrams. Generating these deliverables generally requires interacting with a sandbox filesystem through shell access and using web search, capabilities the model is given through the Stirrup agentic harness.
Most benchmarks test short-answer or multiple-choice responses. GDPval-AA v2 instead evaluates complete deliverables: models operate in an agentic environment with tools, produce file outputs, and have their submissions scored through pairwise grading on relative quality.
Explore Evaluations
A composite benchmark aggregating nine challenging evaluations to provide a holistic measure of AI capabilities across mathematics, science, coding, and reasoning.
GDPval-AA v2 is Artificial Analysis' evaluation framework for OpenAI's GDPval dataset. It tests AI models on real-world tasks across 44 occupations and 9 major industries. Models are given shell access and web browsing capabilities in an agentic loop via Stirrup to solve tasks, with Elo ratings derived from blind pairwise comparisons.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of the APEX-Agents benchmark, testing AI agents on long-horizon, cross-application tasks in professional-services environments with realistic application tooling.
A dual-control conversational AI benchmark simulating technical support scenarios where both agent and user must coordinate actions to resolve telecom service issues.
A fintech customer-support benchmark from the ๐-Knowledge framework that tests whether agents can navigate a large unstructured knowledge base and execute multi-step tool calls to resolve realistic banking workflows.
An agentic benchmark evaluating AI capabilities in terminal environments through software engineering, system administration, and data processing tasks.
A verified refresh of Terminal-Bench v2.0 โ 89 curated tasks across software engineering, system administration, data processing, model training, and security, with environment and instruction fixes so scores reflect agent capability rather than environment gaps.
A scientist-curated coding benchmark featuring 288 test set subproblems from 80 laboratory problems across 16 scientific disciplines.
Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning Benchmark Leaderboard
A challenging benchmark measuring language models' ability to extract, reason about, and synthesize information from long-form documents ranging from 10k to 100k tokens (measured using the cl100k_base tokenizer).
AA-Omniscience: Knowledge and Hallucination Benchmark
A benchmark measuring factual recall and hallucination across various economically relevant domains.
A benchmark evaluating precise instruction-following generalization on 58 diverse, verifiable out-of-domain constraints that test models' ability to follow specific output requirements.
A frontier-level benchmark with 2,500 expert-vetted questions across mathematics, sciences, and humanities, designed to be the final closed-ended academic evaluation.
The most challenging 198 questions from GPQA, where PhD experts achieve 65% accuracy but skilled non-experts only reach 34% despite web access.
A benchmark designed to test LLMs on research-level physics reasoning tasks, featuring 71 composite research challenges.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of IBM's ITBench benchmark, testing AI agents on Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis from offline incident snapshots. The agent inspects alerts, events, traces, and topology and identifies the contributing-factor entities (deployments, pods, namespaces, network policies, etc.) responsible for the failure.
A composite measure providing an industry standard to communicate model openness for users and developers.
An enhanced version of MMLU with 12,000 graduate-level questions across 14 subject areas, featuring ten answer options and deeper reasoning requirements.
A lightweight, multilingual version of MMLU, designed to evaluate knowledge and reasoning skills across a diverse range of languages and cultural contexts.
A contamination-free coding benchmark that continuously harvests fresh competitive programming problems from LeetCode, AtCoder, and CodeForces, evaluating code generation, self-repair, and execution.
A 500-problem subset from the MATH dataset, featuring competition-level mathematics across six domains including algebra, geometry, and number theory.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination, testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999.
An enhanced MMMU benchmark that eliminates shortcuts and guessing strategies to more rigorously test multimodal models across 30 academic disciplines.
