VOOZH about

URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1307.1244

⇱ [1307.1244] Science and Philosophy: A Love-Hate Relationship

Physics > History and Philosophy of Physics

arXiv:1307.1244 (physics)
[Submitted on 4 Jul 2013 (v1), last revised 2 Jun 2020 (this version, v2)]

Title:Science and Philosophy: A Love-Hate Relationship

View PDF
Abstract:In this paper I review the problematic relationship between science and philosophy; in particular, I will address the question of whether science needs philosophy, and I will offer some positive perspectives that should be helpful in developing a synergetic relationship between the two. I will review three lines of reasoning often employed in arguing that philosophy is useless for science: a) philosophy's death diagnosis ('philosophy is dead'); b) the historic-agnostic argument/challenge "show me examples where philosophy has been useful for science, for I don't know of any"; c) the division of property argument (or: philosophy and science have different subject matters, therefore philosophy is useless for science).
These arguments will be countered with three contentions to the effect that the natural sciences need philosophy. I will: a) point to the fallacy of anti-philosophicalism (or: 'in order to deny the need for philosophy, one must do philosophy') and examine the role of paradigms and presuppositions (or: why science can't live without philosophy); b) point out why the historical argument fails (in an example from quantum mechanics, alive and kicking); c) briefly sketch some domains of intersection of science and philosophy and how the two can have mutual synergy. I will conclude with some implications of this synergetic relationship between science and philosophy for the liberal arts and sciences.
Comments: 19 pages, talk delivered at the conference Rethinking Liberal Education, Amsterdam, June 15, 2013
Subjects: History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:1307.1244 [physics.hist-ph]
(or arXiv:1307.1244v2 [physics.hist-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1307.1244
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Foundations of Science, 25, 2000, pp. 297-314
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-019-09619-2
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Sebastian De Haro [view email]
[v1] Thu, 4 Jul 2013 09:02:00 UTC (400 KB)
[v2] Tue, 2 Jun 2020 14:40:37 UTC (251 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
Current browse context:
physics.hist-ph
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.