VOOZH about

URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08293

⇱ [2001.08293] "How over is it?" Understanding the Incel Community on YouTube

Computer Science > Computers and Society

arXiv:2001.08293 (cs)
[Submitted on 22 Jan 2020 (v1), last revised 23 Aug 2021 (this version, v7)]

Title:"How over is it?" Understanding the Incel Community on YouTube

View PDF
Abstract:YouTube is by far the largest host of user-generated video content worldwide. Alas, the platform has also come under fire for hosting inappropriate, toxic, and hateful content. One community that has often been linked to sharing and publishing hateful and misogynistic content are the Involuntary Celibates (Incels), a loosely defined movement ostensibly focusing on men's issues. In this paper, we set out to analyze the Incel community on YouTube by focusing on this community's evolution over the last decade and understanding whether YouTube's recommendation algorithm steers users towards Incel-related videos. We collect videos shared on Incel communities within Reddit and perform a data-driven characterization of the content posted on YouTube.
Among other things, we find that the Incel community on YouTube is getting traction and that, during the last decade, the number of Incel-related videos and comments rose substantially. We also find that users have a 6.3% chance of being suggested an Incel-related video by YouTube's recommendation algorithm within five hops when starting from a non Incel-related video. Overall, our findings paint an alarming picture of online radicalization: not only Incel activity is increasing over time, but platforms may also play an active role in steering users towards such extreme content.
Comments: To appear at the 24th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW 2021). Please cite the CSCW version
Subjects: Computers and Society (cs.CY)
Cite as: arXiv:2001.08293 [cs.CY]
(or arXiv:2001.08293v7 [cs.CY] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.08293
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3479556
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Kostantinos Papadamou Dr [view email]
[v1] Wed, 22 Jan 2020 21:47:54 UTC (1,127 KB)
[v2] Sat, 25 Jan 2020 12:40:34 UTC (1,127 KB)
[v3] Mon, 15 Jun 2020 11:55:45 UTC (446 KB)
[v4] Tue, 16 Jun 2020 08:17:04 UTC (446 KB)
[v5] Sun, 17 Jan 2021 16:35:06 UTC (2,265 KB)
[v6] Tue, 18 May 2021 09:24:47 UTC (2,354 KB)
[v7] Mon, 23 Aug 2021 06:10:09 UTC (2,343 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CY
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.