VOOZH about

URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.14397

⇱ [2606.14397] Running the Gauntlet: Re-evaluating the Capabilities of Agents Beyond Familiar Environments

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2606.14397 (cs)
[Submitted on 12 Jun 2026 (v1), last revised 25 Jun 2026 (this version, v2)]

Title:Running the Gauntlet: Re-evaluating the Capabilities of Agents Beyond Familiar Environments

View PDF
Abstract:As agentic systems continue to evolve and are widely deployed in real-world scenarios, there is a growing demand to faithfully evaluate their capabilities. However, current benchmarks are typically built on popular applications with relatively simple tasks and focus on a narrow set of capabilities while overlooking broader dimensions, resulting in saturated performance on modern agents and failing to probe their limitations. To this end, we introduce GauntletBench, a web-based benchmark for evaluating agent generalisation in challenging scenarios, focusing on three underexplored capabilities (temporal perception, graphical understanding, and 3D reasoning), across five less-covered professional applications (Video Editor, Workflow Builder, 3D Modeller, Flight Analyser, and Circuit Designer), each with 20 vision-intensive tasks (100 in total). Our benchmark provides a modular pipeline that comprises an environment compatible with both open- and closed-source agent frameworks, a controlled web-based application, a well-structured task suite, and an automated evaluation engine with diverse metrics. Contrary to widespread expectations, our empirical results reveal that frontier agentic systems remain far from achieving human-level performance. Even the state-of-the-art agent achieves only a 19.1% success rate on our GauntletBench, highlighting the limitations in these overlooked capabilities and generalisation. By comparison, non-expert human annotators achieve over 80% success on our challenging yet feasible tasks, revealing the substantial gap between current agent capabilities and those required for complex real-world scenarios.
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.14397 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2606.14397v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.14397
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Runqi Lin [view email]
[v1] Fri, 12 Jun 2026 12:32:24 UTC (17,529 KB)
[v2] Thu, 25 Jun 2026 10:49:26 UTC (17,529 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
👁 license icon
view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.