VOOZH about

URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15480

⇱ [2606.15480] A Scalability Analysis of Quantitative Confidence Assessment Methods for Assurance Cases

Computer Science > Software Engineering

arXiv:2606.15480 (cs)
[Submitted on 13 Jun 2026]

Title:A Scalability Analysis of Quantitative Confidence Assessment Methods for Assurance Cases

View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:This paper proposes a model to estimate the decision complexity and effort required to apply quantitative confidence assessment methods to assurance cases. The model considers both the worst and average case for these measures and characterizes how these quantities scale with argument size. Prior work has indicated that the additional effort required to apply these methods is a barrier to their adoption by assurance case practitioners. Researchers developing new methods, or improving existing methods, can use this model to estimate the effort required to apply their method. The proposed model is parameterized using data from published case studies and is applied to three existing quantitative confidence assessment methods: the Bayesian Belief Network method, the Dempster-Shafer Theory method, and the Certus method. The results show that, while Certus has the highest worst-case decision complexity, its average-case effort is lower than the BBN and DST methods.
Comments: Preprint. Version of Record to appear in SafeCOMP'26 Workshop Proceedings published by Springer
Subjects: Software Engineering (cs.SE); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.15480 [cs.SE]
(or arXiv:2606.15480v1 [cs.SE] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.15480
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Simon Diemert [view email]
[v1] Sat, 13 Jun 2026 21:32:52 UTC (274 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
👁 license icon
view license

Current browse context:

cs.SE
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.