Computer Science > Information Retrieval
arXiv:2606.17707 (cs)
[Submitted on 16 Jun 2026]
Title:Do Generative Recommenders Deepen the Information Cocoon? A Closed-Loop Simulation with LLM-powered User Simulators
Authors:Jiyuan Yang, Gengxin Sun, Mengqi Zhang, Lingjie Wang, Yuanzi Li, Hongxi Cui, Xin Xin, Pengjie Ren
View a PDF of the paper titled Do Generative Recommenders Deepen the Information Cocoon? A Closed-Loop Simulation with LLM-powered User Simulators, by Jiyuan Yang and 7 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Recommender systems alleviate information overload, yet repeated feedback between recommendations and user interactions can reinforce existing preferences and narrow users' exposure, forming information cocoons. While this phenomenon has been widely studied in traditional sequential recommendation, its impact on generative recommendation remains unclear. By replacing atomic item IDs with Semantic ID (SID) sequences, generative recommenders introduce a different recommendation mechanism whose role in information cocoon formation is not yet understood. To investigate whether generative recommenders deepen information cocoons, we propose \textsc{RecLoop}, a closed-loop simulation framework with LLM-driven user agents. We compare two generative recommenders and two traditional sequential baselines on two Amazon datasets across multiple feedback cycles. In addition to standard exposure-level metrics, we introduce \emph{Code-Space Structural Cocoon}, a model-level metric that measures concentration in the generated SID space. Experimental results show that generative recommenders are generally less prone to exposure-level cocoon formation than traditional baselines, preserving broader exposure diversity and slowing cross-user homogenization. However, feedback loops can still induce concentration within the generated SID space. We further find that cocoon severity depends strongly on tokenization strategy and model scale: collaborative-signal tokenization produces stronger cocoon effects than semantic tokenization, whereas larger models maintain greater code-space diversity and better retain access to niche content. These findings suggest that information cocoons in generative recommendation are shaped not only by recommendation behavior, but also by item tokenization and model capacity. Our code is available at this https URL.
| Subjects: | Information Retrieval (cs.IR) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2606.17707 [cs.IR] |
| (or arXiv:2606.17707v1 [cs.IR] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.17707
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled Do Generative Recommenders Deepen the Information Cocoon? A Closed-Loop Simulation with LLM-powered User Simulators, by Jiyuan Yang and 7 other authors
Additional Features
References & Citations
Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
Data provided by:
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.