This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Possible redundant to the jpg version B dash (talk) 03:05, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[]
- Labeling this file "Redundant" not only sounds bad, it's not correct.
- Firstly, this file is published by NASA. Therefore, it's a primary source.
- Secondly, as a pdf--as a pdf in which the text is recognized (and recognizable) by humans and machines it has a significant advantage over a jpg--not that I have anything against jpg's.
- I do not agree with you conclusion that this file is redundant nor would I characterize a jpg version of this file as superseding it. Having a jpg version of this file provides another version of this file to users--it certainly does not warrant the deletion of the original. @B dash:
- --CmdrDan (talk) 02:17, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[]
Kept: per User:CmdrDan, as source of JPG version. P 1 9 9 13:37, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[]