Some sections stand completely alone without any citations/sources. While the information in the article is not often challenged, the credibility of this article can be at a deficit. Sections such as "Zen Mods" and "Security" stand completely without any citation. Other paragraphs frequently use timelines, which also need sources. "Reception" is an extremely short section and while important struggles to stand alone with only two articles. Adding more would be greatly appreciated. This may just be me, but I think Zen Mods could be in "Features" instead of having its own sub header. Thanks! Wikipubliceditorpro (talk) 02:25, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[]

I've just tried to improve some of these areas, listing features in greater detail, attributing more information to reviews of the browser, and labeling the remaining primary sources and uncited claims. Are there other types of sources to look out for and integrate beyond just reviews, or are there now enough citations for general verifiability? AgentMuffin4 (talk) 18:27, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[]