VOOZH about

URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Psypherium

⇱ User:Psypherium - Wikipedia


Jump to content
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
User Info
👁 Image
This user has a channel on YouTube.
👁 Image
This user contributes using GNU/Linux.👁 Image
👁 Image
This user contributes with Arch Linux.
👁 Image
This user plays Luanti
👁 Image
This user is an Aussie.
👁 Image
This user listens to free music.
👁 Image
This user often makes mistakes while typing, and would like to take this oppurtunity to aoplogiae.
enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.
en-auThis user is a native speaker of Australian English.
👁 Image
This user likes to use redundant userboxes that are redundant.
👁 Image
This user likes to use redundant userboxes that are redundant.
PAGEIDThe ID of this page is 32655049.
👁 Icon
This user has been on Wikipedia for 18 years, 10 months and 2 days.
👁 Image
This user has uploaded 40 images (at last check) to Wikimedia Commons.
6,000+This user has made more than 6,000 contributions to Wikipedia.
Wikipedia editor
This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Psypherium.





👁 Image
My editing frequency will decrease. Wikipedia moderation is overzealous to the point they will erroneously delete good articles with credible claims of significance backed up by reliable third-party citations (i.e. They delete articles that should not be deleted, ones that comply with their guidelines, and that are demonstrably better than pre-existing articles concerning related entities. "New=maybe bad". Wikipedia has been overtaken by cynical people who are uninterested in investigating their assumptions. They are now removing honestly contributed content in fear it might have been made with a bias. This behaviour persists in cases where there is no evidence of any kind of bias in the contributed text. This is not acceptable behaviour for Wikipedia administrators to engage in. You cannot project your own behaviour outwards and assume it will be the only behaviour engaged in by others. The only acceptable moderation efforts are ones that are based on the literal text of the article, not your own erroneous assumptions about the intent of editors who have been actively contributing for over 2 decades. Wikipedia must avail administrators with additional information concerning the age of the account, the lack of this information is one of the things that forces administrators to make decisions based purely on their own projected biases, instead of decisions based on information. Wikipedia Administration must be investigated and the offenders removed from their positions. STOP MAKING STUPID BIRTHDAY THINGS UNTIL YOU HAVE ACTUALLY FIXED THE CLEARLY IDENTIFIABLE ISSUES WITH FUNDAMENTAL ASPECTS OF YOUR WEBSITE. Wikipedia moderation is usually misplaced and overzealous.
Hello, I'm Alistair Findlay (Psypherium), Bitrot Annihilation Supreme Commander


My primary interest concerning Wikipedia is the rectification or annihilation of software rot, i.e. outdated information, dead citations, insecure citation links, usurped citation links, advertisements masquerading as legitimate citations, etc.


I hope that you all will have good days!



Currently, this editor has earned the Experienced Editor service award.

To get to the next level, Veteran Editor, they need to meet the editing requirement.
Progress towards the next level (by edits): [ 0 / 2000 ]

0% completed