VOOZH about

URL: https://mathworld.wolfram.com/HappyEndProblem.html

⇱ Happy End Problem -- from Wolfram MathWorld


πŸ‘ Image

Happy End Problem


πŸ‘ DOWNLOAD Mathematica Notebook
Download Wolfram Notebook

The happy end problem, also called the "happy ending problem," is the problem of determining for πŸ‘ n>=3
the smallest number of points πŸ‘ g(n)
in general position in the plane (i.e., no three of which are collinear), such that every possible arrangement of πŸ‘ g(n)
points will always contain at least one set of πŸ‘ n
points that are the vertices of a convex polygon of πŸ‘ n
sides. The problem was so-named by ErdΕ‘s when two investigators who first worked on the problem, Ester Klein and George Szekeres, became engaged and subsequently married (Hoffman 1998, p. 76).

Since three noncollinear points always determine a triangle, πŸ‘ g(3)=3
.

Random arrangements of πŸ‘ n=4
points are illustrated above. Note that no convex quadrilaterals are possible for the arrangements shown in the fifth and eighth figures above, so πŸ‘ g(4)
must be greater than 4. E. Klein proved that πŸ‘ g(4)=5
by showing that any arrangement of five points must fall into one of the three cases (left top figure; Hoffman 1998, pp. 75-76).

Random arrangements of πŸ‘ n=8
points are illustrated above. Note that no convex pentagons are possible for the arrangement shown in the fifth figure above, so πŸ‘ g(5)
must be greater than 8. E. Makai proved πŸ‘ g(5)=9
after demonstrating that a counterexample could be found for eight points (right top figure; Hoffman 1998, pp. 75-76).

As the number of points πŸ‘ n
increases, the number of πŸ‘ k
-subsets of πŸ‘ n
that must be examined to see if they form convex πŸ‘ k
-gons increases as πŸ‘ (n; k)
, so combinatorial explosion prevents cases much bigger than πŸ‘ n=5
from being easily studied. Furthermore, the parameter space become so large that searching for a counterexample at random even for the case πŸ‘ n=6
with πŸ‘ k=12
points takes an extremely long time. For these reasons, the general problem remains open.

πŸ‘ g(6)=17
was demonstrated by Szekeres and Peters (2006) using a 1500 CPU-hour computer search which eliminated all possible configurations of 17 points which lacked convex hexagons while examining only a tiny fraction of all configurations. MariΔ‡ (2019) and Scheucher (2020) independently verified πŸ‘ g(6)=17
using satisfiability (SAT) solving in a few CPU hours, a time later reduced to 10 CPU-minutes by Scheucher (2023) and to 8.53 CPU-seconds by Heule and Scheucher (2024).

The first few values of πŸ‘ g(n)
for πŸ‘ n=3
, 4, 5, and 6 are therefore 3, 5, 9, 17, which happen to be exactly πŸ‘ 2^(n-2)+1
. However, the values of πŸ‘ g(n)
for πŸ‘ n>=7
are unknown.

ErdΕ‘s and Szekeres (1935) showed that πŸ‘ g(n)
always exists and derived the bound

where πŸ‘ (n; k)
is a binomial coefficient. For πŸ‘ n>=4
, this has since been reduced to πŸ‘ g(n)<=g_1(n)
for

by Chung and Graham (1998), πŸ‘ g(n)<=g_2(n)
for

by Kleitman and Pachter (1998), and πŸ‘ g(n)<=g_3(n)
for

by TΓ³th and Valtr (1998).


See also

Convex Hull, Convex Polygon

Explore with Wolfram|Alpha

References

Borwein, J. and Bailey, D. Mathematics by Experiment: Plausible Reasoning in the 21st Century. Wellesley, MA: A K Peters, p. 78, 2003.Chung, F. R. K. and Graham, R. L. "Forced Convex πŸ‘ n
-gons in the Plane." Discr. Comput. Geom. 19, 367-371, 1998.
ErdΕ‘s, P. and Szekeres, G. "A Combinatorial Problem in Geometry." Compositio Math. 2, 463-470, 1935.Heule, M. J. H. and Scheucher, M. "Happy Ending: An Empty Hexagon in Every Set of 30 Points." 1 Mar 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.00737.Hoffman, P. The Man Who Loved Only Numbers: The Story of Paul ErdΕ‘s and the Search for Mathematical Truth. New York: Hyperion, pp. 75-78, 1998.Kleitman, D. and Pachter, L. "Finding Convex Sets among Points in the Plane." Discr. Comput. Geom. 19, 405-410, 1998.LovΓ‘sz, L.; PelikΓ‘n, J.; and Vesztergombi, K. Discrete Mathematics, Elementary and Beyond. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2003.MariΔ‡, F. "Fast Formal Proof of the ErdΕ‘s-Szekeres Conjecture for Convex Polygons With at Most 6 Points." J. Automated Reasoning 62, 301-329, 2019.Scheucher, M. "Two Disjoint 5-Holes in Point Sets." Comput. Geom. 91, 101670, 2020.Scheucher, M. "A SAT Attack on Erd-Szekeres Numbers in Rd and the Empty Hexagon Theorem." Computing in Geometry and Topology 2, 2:1-2:13, 2023.Szekeres, G. and Peters, L. "Computer Solution to the 17-Point ErdΕ‘s-Szekeres Problem." ANZIAM J. 48, 151-164, 2006.TΓ³th, G. and Valtr, P. "Note on the ErdΕ‘s-Szekeres Theorem." Discr. Comput. Geom. 19, 457-459, 1998.Soifer, A. "The Happy End Problem." Ch. 31 in The New Mathematical Coloring Book: Mathematics of Coloring and the Colorful Life of Its Creators, 2nd ed. New York: Springer, pp. 321-337, 2024.

Referenced on Wolfram|Alpha

Happy End Problem

Cite this as:

Weisstein, Eric W. "Happy End Problem." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Resource. https://mathworld.wolfram.com/HappyEndProblem.html

Subject classifications