![]() |
VOOZH | about |
I just rewrote the entire page. How do you like it? yoshidude56 19:29, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
I have two things to say. 1. That person means NOTCH, who created Minecraft. 2. Please could you ask around BEFORE you redo it. I like your changes but the original was bigger. However I like the fact that you have tried and you have done a great job. I founded this page, but it does say "If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it." Just anyone who reads these words, add suggestions to this new page. Thanks for stopping it from being deleted :) CycloneChilli 18:36, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Idk if I'm allowed to edit yet, but when I am I will fix the grammar. It irks me to read a sentence saying "It should be made stone bricks or bedrock. No offence though! :) KFiles 00:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
I like the rewrite. Notch is not admin/owner of this wiki, the owner is curse. Who you should have asked is an admin of the wiki. 190.179.249.250 14:54, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Seeming that MCW hasn't got any suggestions along this page, I'll add to it. To start with take off the nightclub, and make it into a disco place instead (I know this sounds dumb because I'm talking about the same thing, but the nightclub has drinks, and yet the "Dance Lounge" has no drinks.). Sound good? Add your suggestions here! –Preceding unsigned comment was added by 101.169.170.157 (Talk) 09:57, 26 June 2012 (UTC). Please sign your posts with ~~~~
As a tutorial page, many of these ideas should have an accompanying design, picture, or diagram to help indicate the means to reproduce a number of architectural effects. Without such things, this tutorial page simply becomes a "list of suggestions and ideas." Further, many of the descriptors can be merged, and made more general, to help reduce the sheer size of the lists in this article; e.g. "Weapon Shop", "Armor Shop", "Junk Shop", etc. can simply be called "Shop". Individual concepts can be explained in each section if necessary. Also, explaining the reason to include the concept is unnecessary. The gist of the concept should be reflected in the name or title of the sections or structures. Naming separate structures that serve the same function is redundant.
Last, the article is in dire need of rewriting. It is rife with rhetorical questions and repeated information. Random offender, Landmark:
Make something that people know it is your town. It should be something impressive, maybe a model of the deathstar or your skin? Maybe something else, works well on servers if you want the people to know and remember your server.
Rewritten:
A landmark can help make a map or server unique, and can be used as a reference point for navigation.
Aside from the conversational tone, the original section is very subjective and contains pointless text("Maybe something else" part can be struck entirely). If this article can't be rewritten in an objective and concise manner, the information is better contributed to a community section and not a wiki entry. –Preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.54.121.200 (Talk) 07:40, 8 July 2012 (UTC). Please sign your posts with ~~~~
Just a suggestion to be added, build your city on a cruise ship. Might be neat to try and fit things in a limited space. Scratchcrackers 22:57, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
There should be more defence things
Alright, I have a question. Why do we need to revise the page? This new revision doesn't seem to fix the problems that the original had. No offense Yoshidude, but this new page is a less plentiful, less well kept version of the original. Also, I don't think pictures are going to be any helpful to this page as a whole. While they might be helpful in the fact that it will create a picture for what it could look like, it doesn't inspire creativity, which is what Minecraft and this page is/was all about. Same with the rest of the page, it's pretty much telling the player that this must be this and that must be that, no turning off the path.(e.g. Build this taiga biome, build that with stairs) Excuse me but if we must revise this page it should at least allow somewhat more vague descriptions on what you can do. PLEASE READ ALL OF THIS AND I WOULD LIKE IT IF SOMEONE REPLY TO ME PREFERABLY YOSHIDUDE56.--| Forevakill | Talk 21:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
I like it to, but i agree it feels "bossy"-24.62.109.70 21:59, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
I apologize if this should be on the forum, but I have a suggestion. To protect the page from becoming a list of ideas, perhaps we could make an article.. something called Tutorials/House Ideas. However the metropolis article still has the threat of becoming a list of suggestions so I thought up a plan to prevent it. But before we create one I need to ask around so that I know we have permission. Last of all, if there is already an article about this page I'm talking about, please let me know. I may be an expert on Minecraft (almost!) but I do not know much about the Wiki's articles. --58.170.128.149 10:10, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Im not sure its a good idea. i mean whats WRONG with idea lists?Im gonna try MY hand at this page and see if its THAT bad. ps i ment EDIT not just redo the page.
-24.62.109.70 01:17, 27 September 2012 (UTC)srsly It's good to have a list of ideas. I know this is a wiki, but wikis help you and these ideas help people to create cities.
Id agree if 24 did not curse up this talk page.Mind you, he/she actully has griefed up before.
Anyway, I DO agree, and we need to keep it an idea list. Same thing happend......
Ever heard of the tragic story of alternitive experinceces?
I would recreatate it, but i need ops/admins approval.
Louise4589TheEpic 00:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
A few things that we need to change:
1. You CAN find ores in superflat, gravel, etc. because of customization. A good idea is to replace it with "Superflat is not recommended in Survival mode unless you have customized the map because of a shortage of minerals."
2. The phrase "You should *blah blah blah*" sounds too bossy/forceful. We can change it to "You may *blah blah blah*" to make it more friendly-sounding.
3. Making the article neater. There are a ton of lines that are aligned wrong and quote boxes (are they quote boxes?) instead of bullets. Capitalization problems are also all over the article.
4. The phrase "If you want to add things to the buildings section, be sure to put it in alphabetical order." - do we need it? It's not doing anything but giving a pain to anyone that wants to add a building.
5. Page could use a correction and cleanup. An example is the sentence "Maybe use tnt cannons?" in the airport suggestion is technically incorrect, you cannot launch a block with tnt, and if it was possible, the plane would most likely have a huge hole. Plus, it is not a sentence.
108.208.101.17 20:49, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
I meant The tnt would launch PLAYERS. And i agree with the "bossyness". ill fix it now.
This probably isn't a good place to put it, but I really want to edit this page. However, I can't log in or make an account. My Wikia account is MattiasWestby, but this wiki doesn't recognize it, and when I try to make a new account this bizarre thing pops up where I have to identify only the cats in a series of pics. However, no matter how many times I select them, it still says I have to select the cats. I really have some good ideas on good cities, but if I try to edit the page it says my IP Adress will be publicly recorded. What can I do?
I know this is a bad place to put it and I apologize.
173.183.72.196 01:23, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
173.183.72.196 01:20, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
173.183.72.196 23:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Just so you know, to select the cats you click on the picture, not the Adopt Me! button. Make sure that you have your password exactly the same when you type it again. I tried 4 times until I realized that the caps lock was on. Meeples10 21:11, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
I think we should keep the building's. List in Alphabetical order so we can find what we're. Looking for faster. Like in 2 months there is probably. Going to be slot more buildings on that list. So we should keep it in alphabetical. Order so we don't to go reading the whole. Page for. One building. You hear me?
I deleted the extra topic. 70.181.68.226 17:14, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
jerhill11------
I know what you meant by don't sign the edits and get an account and this is not a personal page, etc, but was it really necessary to delete all of my contributions to the page?
I did what you said and got an account. Meeples10 13:37, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
—Kanegasi ☺C 01:47, 4 March 2013 (UTC)I have 2 things to say: 1) the Factory city is supposed to be bizarre, it's not really supposed to be pretty, and it needs to be in creative to reach the top. 2) I have a huge city, and the fire station works great.
Just saying, under Jobs it says factory worker(above) but there is no factory anymore. ~Vendily~ 23:31, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
I have added city hall to the buildings list several times and I always get deleted by Meeples10. Every city needs a city hall. Why can't ours have one?
--24.84.172.81 23:48, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
--24.84.172.81 23:49, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
×Meeples10× 10:20, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. Just a thought, could we make a whole government section?
--24.84.172.81 23:26, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
I HATE the Urban Zone, Great Road? Ramifications? Offices are in the Commercial Zone already!
--204.83.92.114 13:52, 19 May 2013 (UTC)--204.83.92.114 13:52, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Please note that all contributions to Minecraft Wiki are considered to be released under the CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 (see Minecraft Wiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
You may also post content obtained from Mojang, its websites, manuals and guides, concept art and renderings, press and fansite kits, and other such copyrighted material that Mojang has made available to the general public, to the Minecraft Wiki. All rights, title and interest in and to such content shall remain with Mojang, as applicable, and such content is not licensed pursuant to the Terms of Service.
Please note: ■ If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it. ■ On talk/discussion pages, please sign your comment by typing four tildes (~~~~). ■ Please use the Show preview button before saving changes to reduce the number of edits shown in the recent changes list.
👁 Go Pigs!
×Meeples10× ᐸ Talk
Contribs 01:40, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
--24.84.172.81 19:30, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
--24.84.172.81 22:00, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
1. Meeples and creepergoboom, you have no right to demand manners, espeicially in a rude way. 2. 24.84.172.81, please could you be a little nicer? 3. I agree that the section is messy. I don't want it deleted, but it needs tiding up. Sugestions: after ramifications put framework in brackets; define what a great road is; get rid of optionals in brackets, because they make it seem bossy; give a link to a good house for a president or leader should be. They wouldn' live in a a dirt hut, would they? --204.83.92.114 18:21, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
There are still a lot of problems with the page. To name a few:
1. Many ideas for buildings go on and on, such as (and this is one I made up as an example) "You should use spruce logs and stone brick and brick to build the houses and make sure you have a port and lots and lots of roads..." Basically, there are a lot of run-on sentences.
2. Another problem with the page is it tells you how to build a city without adding in words like "maybe" or "possibly" or "if you'd like". Whoever wrote half the thing seems to have just thrown out forceful ideas.
3. Way too much of the article suggests mods, even though a perfectly plausible city can be made on vanilla survival.
4. A lot of the "Buildings" section, specifically the "mini-games" subsection, suggests implausible ideas that would make the city seem less like a city.
5. Far too much of the article suggests things like "elite residents", "celebrities", and "government agents", suggesting that these people sit around all day doing nothing, which would strongly detract from actually playing minecraft since it's a BUILDING GAME. Elite residents and celebrites would sit at their computers with Minecraft open, doing... what?
6. A lot of ideas get vastly over-specific, such as the entire "futuristic skyscraper all-in-one", which goes on from just a skyscraper to explaining a whole possibility of post-apocalyptic themed concepts.
7. It's still rife with spelling errors, overuse of capitalization, and incorrectly used punctuation.
8. "Government" section, anyone? Are you serious with that?
9. Much of the article ignores use of objects such as torches, with Glowstone being over-used as a building/lighting material. --75.105.227.219 20:44, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
_________________________________________
1. Thanks. 2. Thanks again. 3. I see your point. 4. Ok, but do you go running around an actual city and see a building that says "PORK PUSHER" on it? 5. That doesn't answer my question, what do these higher-ups DO? Like, celebrities, what goes on there? I mean, I know leaders are pretty required, but what of these "elite residents"? If they're really elite, they are creative enough to build their own house. 6. Good point, but some stuff goes a little too far still. 7. Yeah, I get you there. 8. Alrighty, I just didn't want new players seeking information to get the idea that this wiki is the source of all life and such. 9. Thanks once more.
Both one is clearly pointless.Crep987 (talk) 05:37, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
They have a point to me; they're for players who want to fight or who are up for some kind of challenge. I'm not one of them. I stay on creative mode! :D PenguinzroxXD (talk) 04:52, 2 November 2014 (UTC) PenguinzroxXD
While I was building a city on an island, I thought the other people might wanted to use it. I thought the best way to show it was to add it as a theme. What do you think bout building an island and then making a city? It's hard work, but it might look good! --PenguinzroxXD (talk) 20:35, 2 December 2014 (UTC)PenguinzroxXD
Coruscant, from Star Wars, is already copyrighted. To still do it, just rename it as what it is.(I cannot spell it properly)
Just letting you know :) 49.148.174.66 10:31, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Okay, I am new to editing the wiki, but have a pretty good idea of what I am doing. I always loved this page, but it distresses me to see it in such a mess. Firstly, I recently edited the first few sections. Second of all, the page has both American English and Queen's English spellings for some words. Do you think we should just leave them or choose one to be standard? Also, I am going to move the Memorial bit from the city type to the buildings area, as it is not needed in that section. If nobody answers soon, I will do/decide myself. Also, can we PLEASE clear out the older and out of date conversation on the talk page? 71.210.28.157 17:40, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
I wanted to build a city in Minecraft, but I could not think of anything, so I looked here. Now I can't decide which one to build.
what about entertainment? don't you want something to do? like a waterpark and/or rollercoasters.... 168.174.253.75 21:46, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
I love Zelda series. Thanks to this page, I know how to name the currency in my city: Rupees! Okokup (talk) 06:40, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
So I read this and i haven't building a metropolis yet but I will and I have very bad short-term memory so I won't remember all the geeks so I will reread the article and I don't know what or how or why or whatever do you gotta do if about the school in nurses office if like someone gets whither then like... You know..... Grownstudent (talk) 22:18, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
I have the idea of making some new sections related the goverment of the city. For example, we could make some sort of "goverment rules" or other elated things. Peruvian Ball (talk) 16:00, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
We haven’t had anything in the talk since 2020! There’s been nothing in 2021 and I have to put something on the talk in 2022 so that it is not same as 2021! So, maybe we could have a Military section. We have to protect the city obviously. Army in Jobs is not enough to me! It does not go deep enough for me because how about navies? Air forces? Ok I might be wrong but please add a Military section.
—-76.93.55.75 20:18, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Why is there a full paragraph explaining killing animals in an animal shelter 😭 This is Minecraft, you really, really do not need to include this.
After all, this is essentially a building tutorial. Content related to server management systems is completely off-topic. A building tutorial has no need to discuss political and economic systems. Moreover, "Government" in particular is far too political and utterly inappropriate to be included here. Loonni (talk) 06:02, 17 May 2026 (UTC)