The table starts:
n | SP[n]
----+---------------------------
1 | (1)
2 | (1, 2, 1)
3 | (1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 1, 3, 2, 1)
4 | (1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 3, 1, 4, 2, 3, 1, 2, 4, 3, 1, 2,
| 1, 3, 4, 2, 1, 3, 2, 4, 1, 3, 2, 1, 4, 3, 2, 1)
5 | (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 5, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 5, 3, 4, 1,
| 2, 3, 5, 4, 1, 2, 3, 1, 4, 5, 2, 1, 3, 4, 2, 5, 1, 3, 4,
| 2, 1, 5, 3, 4, 2, 1, 3, 5, 4, 2, 1, 3, 4, 5, 2, 1, 4, 3,
| 5, 2, 1, 4, 5, 3, 2, 1, 4, 5, 2, 3, 1, 4, 2, 5, 3, 1, 4,
| 2, 3, 5, 1, 4, 2, 3, 1, 5, 4, 2, 3, 1, 2, 4, 5, 3, 1, 2,
| 4, 3, 5, 1, 2, 4, 3, 1, 5, 2, 4, 3, 1, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1,
| 5, 4, 3, 2, 5, 1, 4, 3, 2, 5, 4, 1, 3, 2, 4, 5, 1, 3, 2,
| 4, 1, 5, 3, 2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 2, 4, 1, 3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 1, 2)
One can consider an initial row 0 of length 0, producing row 1 as concatenation of (), (1), ().
Row 2 results from duplicating row 1 with (2) inserted in the middle.
Row 3 results from making the list of all permutations in row 2, ((1, 2), (2, 1)), then duplicating these and inserting (3), i.e.: ((1, 2, 3, 1, 2), (2, 1, 3, 2, 1)), then merging together with the second instance of the overlapping '2' removed in the middle.
Row 4 results in the same way from row 3, where the permutations are all length 3 substrings except for the middle (1, 2, 1).
Applying the same procedure to row 4 yields a superpermutation of {1, ..., 5} of minimal length 153 which is palindromic as the earlier ones, but not the lexicographically first one, which is given above.