VOOZH about

URL: https://policescorecard.org/id

⇱ Police Scorecard: Idaho


👁 Image
Skip to Content

We obtained data on 83 Police and 44 Sheriff’s Depts in the state of Idaho.

  Loading Map ...

Scorecard at a Glance

Average for 4 Sections: 55%

Scores range from 0-100% comparing states with population. States with higher scores spend less on policing, use less force, are more likely to hold officers accountable and make fewer arrests for low-level offenses.

Worse
50th Percentile
Better
Police Funding:  72%
Police Budget Cost per Person
Misconduct Settlements
Fines/Forfeitures
Police Presence/Over-Policing (Officers per Population)
Police Violence:  59%
Force Used per Arrest
Deadly Force per Arrest
Unarmed Victims of Deadly Force per Arrest
Racial Disparities in Deadly Force
Worse
50th Percentile
Better
Police Accountability:  44%
Misconduct Complaints Upheld
Excessive Force Complaints Upheld
Discrimination Complaints Upheld
Criminal Misconduct Complaints Upheld
Approach to Law Enforcement:  46%
Arrest Rate for Low Level Offenses
Homicides Solved
Racial Disparities in Drug Arrests
Jail Incarceration Rate
Jail Deaths per 1,000

Key Findings

94 Killings by Police

Based on population, a Black person was 2.1x as likely and a Latinx person was 1.3x as likely to be killed by police as a White person in Idaho from 2013-23.

754 civilian complaints of police misconduct

23% were ruled in favor of civilians from 2016-22.

628,684 arrests made

73% of all arrests were for low-level, non-violent offenses from 2013-23.

Police Funding i

Section Score: 72% -1%

Police Funding By Year

$540.05M  |  1,687,809 Residents  |  $344 per Resident

More Police Funding per Capita than 29% of States

Source: US Census Bureau

Funds taken from communities in fines and forfeitures

Total: $377.18M from 2010-20

More Fines/Forfeitures than 90% of States

Source: US Census Bureau

Number of officers per 1k population

3,120 Officers  |  17.8 per 10k Residents

More Officers per Population than 25% of States

Source: Federal LEOKA Database

Police violence i

Section Score: 59% -17%

Open in New Window

Less-Lethal Force

Used More Force per Arrest than N/A of States

241 Incidents  |  13 every 10k arrests  |  +3%

No Data Found Add Data

Source: Police Department

Open in New Window

Deadly Force

94 Killings by Police from 2013-23  |  1.5 every 10k arrests

^  More Killings by Police per Arrest than 69% of States   

Source: Mapping Police Violence

Deadly Force by Armed Status

6% Unarmed  |  41% Did Not Allegedly Have a Gun

Unarmed Other Alleged Gun Vehicle
6%
31%
59%

^  More Unarmed People Killed per Arrest than 27% of States   

Open in New Window

Police Violence by Race

Black Latinx N.Am API Other White

Population of Idaho

12%
82%

Idaho Law Enforcement Demographics

People Arrested

13%
7%
72%

People Killed

13%
12%
69%

^  More Racial Disparities in Deadly Force than 20% of States   

Source: Uniform Crime Report, Mapping Police Violence, LEMAS

Police Accountability i

Section Score: 44% -6%

Total civilian complaints

754 from 2016-22  |  23% Ruled in Favor of Civilians

Complaints Not Sustained Complaints Sustained

Use of Force Complaints

135 Reported  |  4% Ruled in Favor of Civilians

Complaints of Police Discrimination

1 Reported  |  0% Ruled in Favor of Civilians

Complaints Reported Ruled in Favor of Civilians

Alleged Crimes Committed by Police

5 Reported  |  40% Ruled in Favor of Civilians

Complaints Reported Ruled in Favor of Civilians

Approach to Law Enforcement i

Section Score: 46% -21%

Source: Uniform Crime Report

Arrests By Year

628,684 Arrests Reported from 2013-2023

Low Level Arrests Other Arrests
More Info

Arrests for Low Level Offenses

459,026 Arrests  |  30 per 1k residents

^  Higher Arrest Rate for Low Level Offenses than 78% of States   

Disparities in Arrests for Low Level Offenses by Race/Ethnicity

Black people were 4.8x more likely and Latinx people were 1.4x more likely to be arrested for low level, non-violent offenses than a white person.

Black Latinx White

Percent of total arrests by type

All Arrests for Low Level Offenses ( 73% )

Drug Possession ( 16% )

Violent Crime ( 3% )

Open in New Window

Homicides Unsolved

374 Homicides from 2013-23  |  127 Unsolved

^  Solved Fewer Homicides than 88% of States   

Percent of Homicides Unsolved by Race

Homicides of Latinx Victims Unsolved ( 14% )

Homicides of White Victims Unsolved ( 4% )

Source: MAP/Supplementary Homicide Report

Deaths in Jail

38 Deaths from 2013-19  |  9 per 1k Jail Population

Homicide Suicide Other Investigating

100%

^ Higher Rate of Jail Deaths than 18% of States   

Jail Incarceration rate

4,250 Avg Daily Jail Population  |  3 per 1k residents

^  More than 63% of Sheriff's Depts  

People in Jail Without Being Convicted

64 % of People in Jail

Idaho Statewide Scores

Rankings are based upon a 0 to 100 percentage scale. States with higher scores use less force, make fewer arrests for low level offenses, solve murder cases more often, hold officers more accountable and spend less on policing overall.

Overall Scores for States where We Have Obtained the Most Data.

👁 Grade Scale
Tap "show more" to see extended list

0-29% 30-59% 60-69% 70-79% 80-89% 90-100% Incomplete
Statewide Score 5YR
7. Bannock County 34% -16%
6. Ada County 41% +1%
5. Bonneville County 42% -3%
4. Nampa 46% -14%
3. Kootenai County 46% +13%
2. Canyon County 49%
1. Boise 55% -5%
* Jerome County 30% -7%
* Caribou County 34% -2%
* Nez Perce County 34%
* Shoshone County 35% -8%
* Homedale 36% -3%
* Ketchum 36% -7%
* Sandpoint 36% +14%
* Payette County 38% +7%
* Garden City 39% -3%
* Blackfoot 40% -11%
* Elmore County 40% -3%
* Boise County 40% +2%
* Adams County 40% +1%
* Bonners Ferry 41% +1%
* Owyhee County 41% -1%
* Power County 41% -3%
* Ponderay 41% +6%
* Twin Falls County 41% -13%
* Couer D'alene 42% +1%
* Idaho City 42% -9%
* Spirit Lake 42% -6%
* Kellogg 43%
* Shelley 43% -10%
* Lava Hot Springs 44% +1%
* Wallace 44% +5%
* Priest River 44% +2%
* New Plymouth 44% +1%
* Lincoln County 44% -3%
* Heyburn 44% -4%
* Glenns Ferry 44% +1%
* Gooding County 44% +2%
* Fruitland 44% -10%
* Cascade 44% -4%
* Parma 45% +2%
* Worley 45%
* Sun Valley 45% -1%
* Shoshone 45% -3%
* Pierce 45%
* Washington County 45% -4%
* Fremont County 45% +3%
* Firth 45%
* Council 45% +1%
* Clearwater County 45% -1%
* Burley 45% +2%
* Blaine County 45% -2%
* Smelterville 46% -1%
* Mccall 46% +11%
* Lewiston 46% +2%
* Driggs 46% +2%
* Bingham County 46% -8%
* Ammon Idaho Falls 46% -2%
* Meridian 47%
* Aberdeen 47% -7%
* Jefferson County 47% +9%
* Idaho Falls 47% -3%
* Kamiah 47% -5%
Statewide Score 5YR
* Kimberly/hansen 47% -2%
* Minidoka County 47% -8%
* Oneida County 47% -1%
* Potlatch 47% -2%
* Soda Springs 47% -2%
* Wilder 47% +6%
* Rupert 47% -3%
* Weiser 48% -10%
* Lapwai 48%
* Ucon 48% -3%
* St. Anthony 48% -10%
* Madison County 48%
* Grace 48%
* Gooding 48% +1%
* Cassia County 48% +6%
* Buhl 48% -1%
* Camas County 48% -9%
* Montpelier 49% +5%
* St. Maries 49% -1%
* Salmon 49% +1%
* Post Falls 49% -13%
* Clark County 49% +5%
* Malad City 49% +3%
* Lewis County 49% -3%
* Challis Challis 49% -2%
* Bear Lake County 49% +1%
* American Falls 50% -3%
* Bonner County 50% +3%
* Custer County 50% +2%
* Pocatello 50% -9%
* Valley County 51% +1%
* Kuna 51% -4%
* Wendall 51% +2%
* Rexburg 51% -7%
* Arco 51% -4%
* Butte County 51% +2%
* Franklin County 51% -2%
* Gem County 52% +2%
* Twin Falls 52% -17%
* Bellevue 53% +4%
* Chubbuck 53% -14%
* Emmett 53% -5%
* Filer 53% -2%
* Grangeville 53% -5%
* Payette 54% -2%
* Rathdrum 54% -5%
* Preston 54% -9%
* Pinehurst 54% -2%
* Latah County 54% +4%
* Moscow 54% +1%
* Hagerman 54% -4%
* Cottonwood 54% -14%
* Caldwell 55% -7%
* Orofino 55% +1%
* Teton County 56% -8%
* Benewah County 58% -2%
* Hailey 58% +8%
* Lemhi County 59% -3%
* Mountain Home 59% +10%
* Osburn 59% -3%
* Jerome 59% -10%
* Idaho County 59% +4%
* Boundary County 59% +2%
* Rigby 59% -2%

* An asterisk indicates this location did not publish enough data to evaluate. Click below to add data to the Scorecard.

Add New Data

About This Scorecard

This is the first nationwide evaluation of policing in the United States. It was built using data from state and federal databases, public records requests to local police departments, and media reports. While police data is never perfect, and there are additional indicators that still need to be tracked, the Police Scorecard is designed to provide insight into many important issues in policing.

Police Scorecard is an independent 501(c)(3) organization, learn more about our team here. If you have feedback, questions about the project, or need support with an advocacy campaign, contact our Founder, Samuel Sinyangwe.

methodology Source Data

Use this Scorecard to identify issues within police departments that require the most urgent interventions and hold officials accountable for implementing solutions. For example, cities with higher rates of low level arrests could benefit most from solutions that create alternatives to policing and arrest for these offenses. In cities where police make fewer arrests overall but use more force when making arrests, communities could benefit significantly from policies designed to hold police accountable for excessive force. And cities where complaints of police misconduct are rarely ruled in favor of civilians could benefit from creating an oversight structure to independently investigate these complaints.

Here's how to start pushing for change

  • Contact your State's Governor and Attorney General, share your scorecard with them and urge them to enact policies to address the issues you've identified:
  • Look up your state and federal representatives below, then tell them to take action to hold police accountable in your community.
    Find Elected Officials

What's Next

Step 1: COMPLETED

👁 Step 1

Obtain data on 100 California cities. Refine methodology in response to feedback from communities, researchers and local officials.

Step 2: COMPLETED

👁 Step 2

Expand to every major law enforcement agency in America and include additional indicators such as police budgets and jail incarceration.

Step 3: IN PROGRESS

👁 Step 3

Inform data-driven solutions nationwide. Update as new federal, state and local data are collected. Track progress and hold cities accountable to results.

Select Department