VOOZH about

URL: https://steamcommunity.com/app/208650/discussions/0/405693392930967371/

⇱ PC Update - March 8th :: Batman™: Arkham Knight General Discussions

© Valve Corporation. All rights reserved. All trademarks are property of their respective owners in the US and other countries. Privacy Policy  |  Legal  |  Accessibility  |  Steam Subscriber Agreement  |  Refunds  |  Cookies
👁 Image
👁 STEAM
👁 Image
 This topic has been pinned, so it's probably important
PC Update - March 8th
Hi Everyone,

A hotfix for Batman: Arkham Knight was released today and contains the following update:
  • Addressed an issue with combat speed. FreeFlow combat speed now increases in line with successful consecutive critical strikes.

For more information, check out the post from CODA on our community forums: {LINK REMOVED}https://community.wbgames.com/t5/Batman-Arkham-Knight-General/NEWS-Hotfix-Patch-Incoming/m-p/1068900
< >
Showing 1-15 of 202 comments
thats it? thats only that? no pefrormance optimization? no better support for amd cards? this is like a killing joke...
#2
I pray this patch does something...
#3
i gave up hope for this game long time ago...came here because i saw the game updating itself for some reason...
#4
The bug affects the crappy consoles too. Thats the only reason they've done anything.
#5
That needed 150 MB? Wow... just wow.
#6
Originally posted by SenMithrarin85:
The bug affects the crappy consoles too. Thats the only reason they've done anything.
exactly...
#7
thanks for still supporting pc unlike some companies we know not saying any name (NRS = MKX)
#8
Thanks for the update, but instead of wasting time on patching this, you start work on reduxing the game into the unreal4 engine instead, and give PC owners a descent version of the game....
#9
I find it strange that this required 150MB of space. Entire games were done in less space than that, significant games.
#10
Dear Mr. or Mrs. (don´t know) wb.elder.pliny

Back in October (31th to be precise) 2015 Yorick posted in this Forum that the issues you can fix will be adressed and you will talk about the issues you cannot fix.

How about start talking about this? How about giving the PC-Community a few infos? Can we expect some more fixes? What in this Game can not be fixed?
I doubt that will harm any maybe existing NDA
#11
That is all? A minor bug? What about the ram usage problem, or the fact that the entire game is a problem. I spent $60 on this game and I got 40fps with dips into 15fps no matter what setting the game is on. Ultra and Low run the same. Not a single frame different. This game is broken for AMD hardware and most likely Nvidia hardware too. Fix the game, not some bug no one has noticed. I am very dissapointed that I have a game I was looking forward too, but I cannot play.
#12
Originally posted by The@Doctor:
Dear Mr. or Mrs. (don´t know) wb.elder.pliny

Back in October (31th to be precise) 2015 Yorick posted in this Forum that the issues you can fix will be adressed and you will talk about the issues you cannot fix.

How about start talking about this? How about giving the PC-Community a few infos? Can we expect some more fixes? What in this Game can not be fixed?
I doubt that will harm any maybe existing NDA
They already did this. SLI for instance has been confirmed as a no-go.
#13
Originally posted by teambigboss:
thats it?

Yup.

thats only that?

Yes, right.

no pefrormance optimization?

What exactly where you expecting? 60+ FPS on a C64? If you want more performance, fix or upgrade your rig.

no better support for amd cards?

Again, what are you expecting? AMD makes excellent hardware, but it's just a simple fact that they lack in certain areas (Tesselation for example, which isn't entirely their fault, but still...) where NVIDIA Excels.

this is like a killing joke...

Oh, ha-ha.

Originally posted by Orangeator:
What about the ram usage problem

What "RAM usage problem"?
Using more memory than YOU (a layman) thinks a game should != "problem"

or the fact that the entire game is a problem.

Ahuh. No problems here. Need i mention your potato?
Last edited by Buck; Mar 8, 2016 @ 1:15pm
#14
Originally posted by Kurai Shidosha:
I find it strange that this required 150MB of space. Entire games were done in less space than that, significant games.
Entire games from 10 years ago maybe... or some Indie games... a 150MB patch for a AAA game like this would be considered small.
#15
< >
Showing 1-15 of 202 comments
Per page: 1530 50

👁 Image
Report this post

REASON
Note: This is ONLY to be used to report spam, advertising, and problematic (harassment, fighting, or rude) posts.