Is it REALLY a good idea to use bio information from the awful Beast Wars profiles books? They're hopelessly inaccurate for the Beast Wars II and Beast Wars Neo characters. Vanguard 14:00, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Regardless of any personal oppinions on their quality, they're just as much official canon as any other official material, which means, I think, they should get exactly the same treatment as any other material.
- IIRC, the idea behind our begining bios is: "Describe who the character is in a general and continuity-neutral fasion." If something in one portrayle conflicts with something from another than they both get defered to the individual continuity sections below for specific detailing there. So if something describing Autocrasher here from IDW specifically conflicts with the BW2 stuff then the conflict should be noted above and then detailed below. I don't know enough of BW2 myself to judge. --ZacWilliam 14:14, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Blaster gets mini-bios at the head of his 'toon and comic sections because they're so different. When bios are contradictory, follow this model. -Derik 16:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's what I was attempting to describe. :)
Move
Yes, it is way past time we stopped using the misinterpretation and went with the obvious rendition. S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 23:21, 25 July 2017 (EDT)
