 |
VOOZH | about |
|
VOOZH | about |
We’re so glad you’re here. You can expect all the best TNS content to arrive Monday through Friday to keep you on top of the news and at the top of your game.
Check your inbox for a confirmation email where you can adjust your preferences and even join additional groups.
Follow TNS on your favorite social media networks.
Become a TNS follower on LinkedIn.
Check out the latest featured and trending stories while you wait for your first TNS newsletter.
The Rust Foundation on Thursday announced the launch of the Rust Foundation Trusted Training (RFTT) program, a new formal accreditation for Rust training providers backed by the nonprofit that stewards the language itself.
Five organizations make up the founding cohort: Mainmatter, Integer 32, Wyliodrin, Doulos, and Ferrous Systems — all established players in the Rust training market.
Dr. Rebecca Rumbul, Executive Director and CEO of the Rust Foundation, tells The New Stack that the Rust Foundation believes the program will build trust, ensuring that those who say they are experts actually are.
“As Rust adoption has accelerated across industries, from systems programming and embedded development to safety-critical infrastructure, the market for Rust training has grown rapidly alongside it,” Rumbul says. “The Rust Foundation Trusted Training program gives learners, employers, and the broader developer community a trusted signal for evaluating Rust training quality.”
“The Rust Foundation Trusted Training program gives learners, employers, and the broader developer community a trusted signal for evaluating Rust training quality.”
A key knock against Rust has been its perceived difficulty to learn.
Carol Nichols, co-founder of Integer 32, a company founded exclusively around Rust in 2016, says, “We’re excited to help more people get up to speed with Rust,” in a statement.
RFTT accreditation is assessed across five areas: credibility and ethical practices, content quality, instructor competence, transparency and accessibility, and evaluation and feedback. Each application is scored independently by a committee of active Rust training professionals against a published rubric, Rumbul says. Final decisions rest with Rust Foundation senior leadership and its Board of Directors.
Accreditation is valid for two years and costs $3,000 per year, plus a one-time $500 application fee covering the initial review. Renewals don’t carry the application fee. Reduced rates apply for microbusinesses. The fees are published at rustfoundation.org/rftt.
Rumbul is clear that the program is set up to generate revenue for the foundation, but says it is operational rather than profit-driven. The fees are set to cover the administrative costs of running a credible review program, not to generate a surplus, she says, adding that accreditation is assessed against published criteria, not granted for payment.
To qualify, organizations must be Rust Foundation members with at least two years in business and at least one year of offering Rust training. Independent trainers and microbusinesses — defined as organizations with three or fewer employees and less than $100,000 in annual revenue — can contact training@rustfoundation.org to explore eligibility on a case-by-case basis.
The program is open to non-English training providers. Materials in other languages are submitted with English translations for review, and geographic and linguistic diversity count positively under the transparency and accessibility criteria.
Self-paced and online courses are within scope. The foundation says it has no broader position on AI-generated learning tools.
Hover, the program’s governance structure raises some questions. Three of the four steering committee members who helped develop the accreditation criteria — Luca Palmieri of Mainmatter, Carol Nichols of Integer 32, and Alexandru Radovici of Wyliodrin — are founders of organizations in the founding cohort.
“We won’t pretend there’s no overlap between that expertise and the applicant pool. There is, so we built the process to contain it.”
Rumbul acknowledged the overlap.
“We won’t pretend there’s no overlap between that expertise and the applicant pool,” she tells The New Stack. “There is, so we built the process to contain it.”
The safeguards include that the criteria are public and capability-based.
Moreover, “No member reviews their own application, and reviewers don’t decide who passes,” Rumbul says. Instead, they assess against the same fixed, published must-haves applied to every applicant and only make recommendations; a concern from one reviewer triggers further review by the committee, not an automatic denial, and the final decision rests with senior Rust Foundation leadership. Reviewing another provider, therefore, means applying a public standard to make a recommendation to us, not exercising discretion over a competitor.”
The Foundation confirmed that not all applicants cleared the bar on the first attempt. Some were given specific feedback and a path to requalify. The foundation won’t disclose individual applicant outcomes or a running tally of results, citing fairness and confidentiality.
“Naming them would be unfair and would discourage organizations from applying. Our aim is to help providers reach the bar.”
“Naming them would be unfair and would discourage organizations from applying,” Rumbul says. “Our aim is to help providers reach the bar.”
Rumbul describes year-one success primarily in terms of trust rather than growth. The program is built around the quality signal, not revenue, she says, and the pool of Rust training providers isn’t bottomless.
Individual or course-level accreditation is on the longer-term roadmap but is capacity-dependent. For now, the designation applies to a provider’s overall training offering rather than individual courses or learners.
The RFTT provider list and full program criteria are available at rustfoundation.org/rftt. The foundation is also accepting new applications on a rolling basis.
