Home / Solutions / Non-Animal Navigator

Non-Animal Navigator™

Expert strategy and AI-enabled biosimulation to reduce, refine, or replace animal studies

Navigate the evolving nonclinical landscape with confidence

Following the FDA’s announcement to phase out animal testing for monoclonal antibodies and other drugs, preclinical development is entering a new era. A fundamental change in drug development has started and the best prepared companies must ‘future-proof’ their portfolios to gain competitive advantage from timeline acceleration, cost reduction and more predictive evidence generation via biosimulation. AI- and in vitro-based toxicity models, predictive biosimulation, and other new approach methodologies (NAMs) will play a critical role. With thousands of mAbs currently in preclinical development, drug developers face major opportunities—and regulatory shifts—as they move beyond traditional animal studies. Certara’s Non-Animal Navigator™ solution helps companies adapt by selecting and optimizing the best-fit NAM strategies. We do this by first conducting a gap analysis. Based on this assessment, we then tailor a bespoke software and services solution for the particular asset. Using this approach helps our clients accelerate development, manage costs, and ensure regulatory alignment.

25+ years of experience helping sponsors and regulatory agencies integrate predictive, mechanistic models into the development and regulatory evaluation of biologics including monoclonal antibodies
Expert consultants with decades of combined experience in Pharma and as regulators at FDA, EMA, and other major health authorities
80% of drugs leveraging PBPK for FDA approval in recent years used the Simcyp PBPK Simulator

Hone your regulatory strategy

The FDA roadmap creates new opportunities to design non-clinical safety programs that leverage new approach methodologies instead of in vivo studies. In the near term, companies with mAbs in preclinical or early clinical development must quickly reassess their regulatory strategies. Early clinical-stage companies should explore how NAMs could reduce chronic toxicology requirements, while pre-IND sponsors must design a NAM-based data package. In both cases, strategies must be scientifically sound and aligned with regulatory expectations, with early FDA engagement critical to securing an agreed path forward.

Evaluate opportunities and risks

Alternative approaches to animal toxicology studies can lower costs, shorten timelines, and reduce animal use, especially for studies using scarce non-human primates. However, skipping key studies carries serious risks if participant safety is compromised. Success requires an integrated, weight-of-evidence strategy combining in vitro, in vivo, and modeling data—with expert toxicology input to avoid pitfalls and ensure regulatory alignment.

Design an optimal IND enabling program

Design a smarter path to first-in-human studies with Certara. By integrating clinical trial and real-world data from sources including our proprietary CODEX database, biosimulation, and regulatory expertise, we help sponsors identify when human experience can supplement or replace animal studies. Our approach optimizes enabling studies, reduces timelines and costs, and secures regulatory alignment early.

Leverage AI-enabled modeling and simulation techniques

Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling enable mechanistic simulation of human and preclinical pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), drug-drug interactions (DDIs), toxicity, and anti-drug antibody (ADA) responses across species including mouse, rat, dog, monkey, and human. These models integrate physiological, biochemical, and molecular data to support species translation, optimize study design, and significantly reduce reliance on animal testing in line with evolving regulatory guidance.

Meet our experts on alternative approaches to animal studies

1 / 5
Experts

Fran Brown, PhD

Senior Vice President, Global Head, Drug Development Science

Fran has over 25 years of experience with strategic and operational global drug development from early discovery to filing and post-marketing.  She possesses a broad knowledge of strategic drug discovery and development, with a special focus on development strategy and the application of model-informed drug development (MIDD).

👁 linkedin
Connect
2 / 5
Experts

Geoff Fatzinger

Vice President, Regulatory Strategy, Certara

Geoff brings 20+ years of expertise and a demonstrated record of regulatory and business accomplishments covering the United States, Europe, Asia Pacific (with in depth experience in Japan, China, and Korea), and Middle East having lived and worked in many countries championing regulatory affairs.

👁 linkedin
Connect
3 / 5
Experts

Patrick F. Smith

SVP, Translational Science, Certara

Dr. Patrick F. Smith is SVP, Translational Science, Certara, where he leads a global team of drug development scientists and regulatory strategy that creates value for clients across the entire life cycle and ultimately accelerates patient access to medicines. With more than 20 years of drug development experience, Patrick has worked across all ...
👁 linkedin
Connect
4 / 5
Experts

Piet van der Graaf

Senior Vice President and Head of Quantitative Systems Pharmacology

Piet van der Graaf, PharmD, PhD is Senior Vice President Applied BioSimulation at Certara, Professor of Systems Pharmacology at Leiden University, and Professor of Pediatrics at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center. Previously, he was the Director of the Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research and held leadership positions at Pfizer in...
👁 linkedin
Connect
5 / 5
Experts

Tong Zhu, PhD, FCP

VP, Global Head, Clinical Pharmacology & Translational Medicine Certara Drug Development Solutions

Dr. Tong Zhu has over 25 years of experience specializing in translational medicine, early development, and clinical pharmacology. She has a wealth of knowledge in pharmaceutical research and development. She was responsible for leading Astellas’ Primary Focus strategy in Mitochondria Biology by working globally to help identify and develop inno...
👁 linkedin
Connect

New Approach Methodologies (NAMs): By the numbers

Related resources

View all
1 / 6
Podcast

New Approach Methodologies: Redefining Animal Testing Alternatives

Explore how New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) and advanced in silico and in vitro tools are reshaping drug development and reducing reliance on animal testing.
Listen now
2 / 6
Guide

New Approach Methodologies (NAMs): By the numbers

We outline today’s animal-use landscape, the rise of NAMs, & how the Non-Animal Navigator supports ethical, efficient, human-relevant drug development.
Read more
3 / 6
Press Coverage

The end of animal testing? Transitioning to models is promising — but no silver bullet

The FDA has stated that the pharma industry must transition to using in vitro assays, organ-on-chip, and modeling to replace animal testing in drug development.
Read more
6 / 6
Blog

How Pharma Can Transition to Non-animal Studies for Investigational Drugs

Pharma companies can ease the transition to non-animal studies for investigational drugs by leveraging NAMs and aligning with the FDA early.
Read more

Simulate and predict drug exposure

The Simcyp® PBPK Simulator is the industry leader and most widely adopted platform for PBPK modeling in drug development. Developed through the expertise of a 25 year-long consortium involving 37 leading global pharmaceutical companies, the Simcyp PBPK Simulator is recognized and licensed by 11 regulatory agencies worldwide. Our Simcyp offerings are backed by a dedicated research and development team as well as a team of global PBPK consultants, ensuring comprehensive support for clients.  

Contact us

Contact us to learn more about the Certara Non-Animal Navigator

Proven expertise: Leverage 25 years of experience and biosimulation platforms trusted by global regulators to drive predictive, future-ready development strategies.
Regulatory confidence: Navigate the shift away from animal testing with strategies aligned to the FDA’s roadmap, built on real-world data, advanced modeling, and validated new approach methodologies.
Accelerated success: Future-proof your pipeline with faster, more cost-effective preclinical pathways that deliver higher—quality evidence and competitive advantage.


FAQs

What role does Certara play in helping sponsors navigate the transition away from animal studies?

Certara’s regulatory experts partner with sponsors to design innovative development strategies that leverage validated in silico and in vitro data, engage proactively with regulators, and prepare submissions that meet FDA expectations while minimizing or eliminating animal use.

Can Certara help obtain regulatory acceptance for alternative methods?

Yes. Certara has a proven track record of gaining regulatory buy-in for non-animal approaches by generating compelling scientific justifications, participating in pre-submission meetings, and guiding the development of data packages that demonstrate human relevance and regulatory compliance.

Are regulatory agencies accepting modeling data in place of animal studies?

Yes. Regulatory agencies worldwide increasingly support the use of validated modeling approaches—such as PBPK and QSP—to inform decisions, reduce reliance on animal data, and align with emerging guidance aimed at modernizing nonclinical testing strategies.

What types of questions can modeling and simulation answer without using animals?

Modeling can address species differences, predict human drug exposure, simulate drug-drug interactions, assess organ-level toxicity, and evaluate immunogenicity risks (e.g., ADA formation)—helping reduce or avoid animal studies while improving translational relevance.

How does Certara’s regulatory strategy align with the FDA’s goal to reduce animal testing?

Certara integrates advanced modeling and simulation tools—such as PBPK, QSP, and in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE)—into regulatory submissions, providing scientifically robust alternatives to traditional animal studies and supporting alignment with the FDA’s evolving nonclinical guidance.