In this module, you will learn how public policy, when conceptualized, must be operationalized through a project or program. You will know how operationalization involves designing a program or project and solving the problem of coordination failure. You will learn about the coordination framework to engage various stakeholders, often with conflicting interests regarding the problem and its solution. You will analyze collective action to reduce the conflict zone in the process.

In this module, you will learn about two fundamental processes of a program or project. First, you will gain an understanding of the control types that vary across resources and lead to project design that can take care of the property rights of resources that cannot be better managed using private property regimes. Second, you will learn about the requirement to think and apply various ways of assigning property rights. You will explore how a properly designed project takes care of these two fundamental processes.

In this module, you will learn how a program theory relates to two components of a program. You will know that the first component develops the change theory, the normative part, and how it identifies the main features to be changed through the program to achieve the planned changes. Further, you will learn about the second component that involves the action theory, the operational part, to bring about changes to be pursued. The module focuses on these two components and provides the fundamental, conceptual, and operational basis for giving a program its intended outcomes.

In this module, you will learn about the specific steps in a program design and how to implement a designed program. You will learn about the specific phases of designing a program, integrating the two components of the program theory. You will also examine how the different components of program design mechanics are integrated into a complete holistic program framework.

This module focuses on the logical framework. You will learn how it evolved during the evaluation exercises over the last five decades. You will explore how it is considered a logical structure that links project design, implementation, and evaluation in a single but linear perspective to facilitate the program to achieve its desired goals.

This module focuses on the evaluation of a program that is generally concerned about its merit or worth. From an analytical perspective, you will learn that they need not always fetch the same results. You will analyze that while merit investigates the intrinsic value created by the program for the intended beneficiaries, worth looks at the extrinsic value of the program offered to those who are paying for the intervention. Hence, the two approaches may not always yield the same results. The module also discusses the fundamental difference between research and evaluation regarding their intended goals.

Programs were made a concrete component of international development cooperation measures. The International Development Practitioners were keen to know the development effectiveness of the programs implemented by different agencies. So, the operational perspectives of the evaluation processes were mainly developed by those engaged with the Development Advisory Council of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). They came out with five specific evaluation criteria in 1992, which were recently modified in 2020, and added one more criterion, with some of the existing ones being modified.