8 vs. 12 Channel DDR5-6000 Memory Performance With AMD 5th Gen EPYC

Written by Michael Larabel in Memory on 20 November 2024 at 11:40 AM EST. Page 4 of 7. 29 Comments.

👁 Stargate Digital Audio Workstation benchmark with settings of Sample Rate: 96000, Buffer Size: 512. 12c DDR5-6000 was the fastest.

👁 Stargate Digital Audio Workstation benchmark with settings of Sample Rate: 96000, Buffer Size: 1024. 12c DDR5-6000 was the fastest.

The Stargate digital audio workstation software performed the same regardless of the additional memory channels.

👁 Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation benchmark with settings of Time To Compile. 12c DDR5-6000 was the fastest.

👁 Timed Linux Kernel Compilation benchmark with settings of Build: defconfig. 12c DDR5-6000 was the fastest.

👁 Timed Linux Kernel Compilation benchmark with settings of Build: allmodconfig. 12c DDR5-6000 was the fastest.

👁 Build2 benchmark with settings of Time To Compile. 12c DDR5-6000 was the fastest.

In the code compilation benchmarks was minimal difference between eight and twelve memory channels when compiling one codebase at a time with a make job for each CPU thread.

👁 Liquid-DSP benchmark with settings of Threads: 64, Buffer Length: 256, Filter Length: 57. 8c DDR5-6000 was the fastest.

👁 Liquid-DSP benchmark with settings of Threads: 128, Buffer Length: 256, Filter Length: 57. 8c DDR5-6000 was the fastest.

👁 Liquid-DSP benchmark with settings of Threads: 192, Buffer Length: 256, Filter Length: 512. 12c DDR5-6000 was the fastest.

With the Liquid-DSP digital signal processing software there wasn't any observed benefit either in this case.

29 Comments - Next Page

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Page

URL: https://www.phoronix.com/review/8-12-channel-epyc-9005/4

⇱ 8 vs. 12 Channel DDR5-6000 Memory Performance With AMD 5th Gen EPYC (Turin) Review - Phoronix

8 vs. 12 Channel DDR5-6000 Memory Performance With AMD 5th Gen EPYC