8 vs. 12 Channel DDR5-6000 Memory Performance With AMD 5th Gen EPYC

Written by Michael Larabel in Memory on 20 November 2024 at 11:40 AM EST. Page 6 of 7. 29 Comments.

👁 Blender benchmark with settings of Blend File: BMW27, Compute: CPU-Only. 8c DDR5-6000 was the fastest.

👁 Blender benchmark with settings of Blend File: Classroom, Compute: CPU-Only. 12c DDR5-6000 was the fastest.

👁 Blender benchmark with settings of Blend File: Fishy Cat, Compute: CPU-Only. 12c DDR5-6000 was the fastest.

👁 Blender benchmark with settings of Blend File: Barbershop, Compute: CPU-Only. 12c DDR5-6000 was the fastest.

👁 Blender benchmark with settings of Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona, Compute: CPU-Only. 8c DDR5-6000 was the fastest.

Blender for CPU-based 3D modeling wasn't yielding any faster renders when going from 8 x DDR5-6000 to 12 x DDR5-6000 memory on this EPYC Turin Supermicro server.

👁 Apache HTTP Server benchmark with settings of Concurrent Requests: 500. 12c DDR5-6000 was the fastest.

The Apache HTTP web server saw slightly better performance out of the four additional memory channels.

29 Comments - Next Page

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Page

URL: https://www.phoronix.com/review/8-12-channel-epyc-9005/6

⇱ 8 vs. 12 Channel DDR5-6000 Memory Performance With AMD 5th Gen EPYC (Turin) Review - Phoronix

8 vs. 12 Channel DDR5-6000 Memory Performance With AMD 5th Gen EPYC