AMD EPYC 4364P & 4564P @ DDR5-4800 / DDR5-5200 vs. Intel Xeon E-2488

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 6 June 2024 at 12:15 PM EDT. Page 2 of 5. 6 Comments.

For code compilation workloads, the DDR5-4800 vs. DDR5-5200 difference made very little impact on the build times for both the AMD EPYC 4364P and 4564P processors. For a CI/CD box part of a build farm, DDR5-4800 is good enough if trying to save slightly on expenses or having troubles finding DDR5-5200 ECC DIMMs.

👁 nginx benchmark with settings of Connections: 200. EPYC 4564P @ DDR5-5200 was the fastest.

👁 nginx benchmark with settings of Connections: 500. EPYC 4564P @ DDR5-4800 was the fastest.

👁 Apache HTTP Server benchmark with settings of Concurrent Requests: 1000. EPYC 4564P @ DDR5-5200 was the fastest.

👁 OpenSSL benchmark with settings of Algorithm: RSA4096. EPYC 4564P @ DDR5-5200 was the fastest.

👁 OpenSSL benchmark with settings of Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305. EPYC 4564P @ DDR5-5200 was the fastest.

Similarly, for many web server workloads the DDR5-5200 performance was only slightly faster over the DDR5-4800 memory with EPYC 4004.

👁 Apache IoTDB benchmark with settings of Device Count: 500, Batch Size Per Write: 100, Sensor Count: 500, Client Number: 100. EPYC 4564P @ DDR5-5200 was the fastest.

👁 Apache IoTDB benchmark with settings of Device Count: 500, Batch Size Per Write: 100, Sensor Count: 800, Client Number: 100. EPYC 4564P @ DDR5-5200 was the fastest.

👁 Apache IoTDB benchmark with settings of Device Count: 800, Batch Size Per Write: 100, Sensor Count: 500, Client Number: 100. EPYC 4564P @ DDR5-5200 was the fastest.

👁 Apache IoTDB benchmark with settings of Device Count: 800, Batch Size Per Write: 100, Sensor Count: 800, Client Number: 400. EPYC 4564P @ DDR5-5200 was the fastest.

With the Apache IoTDB database is one of the workloads where the DDR5-5200 performance was of measurable advantage over DDR5-4800 and consistently for both the EPYC 4364P and EPYC 4564P processors. Even at DDR5-4800 speeds, the EPYC 4364P remained faster than the Xeon E-2488.

6 Comments - Next Page

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next Page

URL: https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-epyc-4004-ddr5-xeon/2

⇱ AMD EPYC 4364P & 4564P @ DDR5-4800 / DDR5-5200 vs. Intel Xeon E-2488 Review - Phoronix

AMD EPYC 4364P & 4564P @ DDR5-4800 / DDR5-5200 vs. Intel Xeon E-2488