AMD EPYC 4565P & EPYC 4585PX Benchmarks Against Xeon 6369P: EPYC 4005 Champions Entry-Level Server Performance

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 13 May 2025 at 09:00 AM EDT. Page 3 of 12. 25 Comments.

👁 Llama.cpp benchmark with settings of Backend: CPU BLAS, Model: Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B-Q8_0, Test: Prompt Processing 512. EPYC 4585PX was the fastest.

👁 Llama.cpp benchmark with settings of Backend: CPU BLAS, Model: Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B-Q8_0, Test: Prompt Processing 2048. EPYC 4585PX was the fastest.

👁 Llama.cpp benchmark with settings of Backend: CPU BLAS, Model: granite-3.0-3b-a800m-instruct-Q8_0, Test: Prompt Processing 512. EPYC 4565P was the fastest.

For those considering a low-cost server for edge AI inferencing or similar purposes, the AMD EPYC 4005 series easily dominates the Intel competition and delivers terrific generational improvement.

👁 Llama.cpp benchmark with settings of Backend: CPU BLAS, Model: granite-3.0-3b-a800m-instruct-Q8_0, Test: Prompt Processing 2048. EPYC 4565P was the fastest.

👁 Llama.cpp benchmark with settings of Backend: CPU BLAS, Model: Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3-Q8_0, Test: Prompt Processing 512. EPYC 4585PX was the fastest.

👁 Llama.cpp benchmark with settings of Backend: CPU BLAS, Model: Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3-Q8_0, Test: Prompt Processing 2048. EPYC 4585PX was the fastest.

Besides having twice the cores/threads as the Xeon 6369P, the EPYC 4005 series with full 512-bit data path AVX-512 makes for especially strong performance compared to the AVX2-only Xeon 6300 series and the 256-bit DP AVX-512 with the prior generation EPYC 4004 series.

👁 Whisper.cpp benchmark with settings of Model: ggml-small.en, Input: 2016 State of the Union. EPYC 4585PX was the fastest.

👁 Whisper.cpp benchmark with settings of Model: ggml-medium.en, Input: 2016 State of the Union. EPYC 4585PX was the fastest.

👁 PyTorch benchmark with settings of Device: CPU, Batch Size: 1, Model: ResNet-50. EPYC 4585PX was the fastest.

👁 PyTorch benchmark with settings of Device: CPU, Batch Size: 1, Model: ResNet-152. EPYC 4585PX was the fastest.

👁 PyTorch benchmark with settings of Device: CPU, Batch Size: 16, Model: ResNet-50. EPYC 4585PX was the fastest.

👁 PyTorch benchmark with settings of Device: CPU, Batch Size: 16, Model: ResNet-152. EPYC 4585PX was the fastest.

👁 PyTorch benchmark with settings of Device: CPU, Batch Size: 256, Model: ResNet-50. EPYC 4565P was the fastest.

👁 PyTorch benchmark with settings of Device: CPU, Batch Size: 256, Model: ResNet-152. EPYC 4585PX was the fastest.

Across various CPU AI benchmarks from Whisper.cpp to PyTorch, the EPYC 4005 series performance was outstanding generationally and compared to the Intel Xeon 6300 series competition both in raw performance and power efficiency.

25 Comments - Next Page

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next Page

URL: https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-epyc-4585px-4565p-benchmarks/3

⇱ AMD EPYC 4565P & EPYC 4585PX Benchmarks Against Xeon 6369P: EPYC 4005 Champions Entry-Level Server Performance Review - Phoronix

AMD EPYC 4565P & EPYC 4585PX Benchmarks Against Xeon 6369P: EPYC 4005 Champions Entry-Level Server Performance