AMD's Epic Performance Gains From The Original EPYC 7601 To EPYC 9755 / EPYC 9965

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 9 July 2025 at 11:30 AM EDT. Page 7 of 8. 4 Comments.

👁 NAMD benchmark with settings of Input: ATPase with 327,506 Atoms. EPYC 9965 was the fastest.

👁 NAMD benchmark with settings of Input: STMV with 1,066,628 Atoms. EPYC 9965 was the fastest.

For HPC workloads some very beautiful performance and power efficiency advancements over the eight years of EPYC Naples to Turin.

👁 OpenRadioss benchmark with settings of Model: Cell Phone Drop Test. EPYC 9755 was the fastest.

👁 OpenRadioss benchmark with settings of Model: INIVOL and Fluid Structure Interaction Drop Container. EPYC 9755 was the fastest.

👁 GPAW benchmark with settings of Input: Carbon Nanotube. EPYC 9755 was the fastest.

👁 NWChem benchmark with settings of Input: C240 Buckyball. EPYC 9755 was the fastest.

👁 Xcompact3d Incompact3d benchmark with settings of Input: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction. EPYC 9965 was the fastest.

👁 LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator benchmark with settings of Model: 20k Atoms. EPYC 9965 was the fastest.

👁 libxsmm benchmark with settings of M N K: 128. EPYC 9755 was the fastest.

And to think the EPYC 7601 performance used to be impressive just eight years ago. The AMD EPYC 9755 and EPYC 9965 processors are crafted beautifully for delivering stunning performance and efficiency for modern high-end Linux servers in 2025.

4 Comments - Next Page

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next Page

URL: https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-epyc-9005-7601/7

⇱ AMD's Epic Performance Gains From The Original EPYC 7601 To EPYC 9755 / EPYC 9965 Review - Phoronix

AMD's Epic Performance Gains From The Original EPYC 7601 To EPYC 9755 / EPYC 9965