VOOZH

URL: https://www.phoronix.com/review/google-cloud-c4d-384/5

⇱ Google Cloud C4D Performance Benchmarks At The Top-End Show 39% Generational Improvement With EPYC Turin Review - Phoronix

👁 Phoronix

Articles & Reviews
News Archive
Forums
Premium
Contact
Categories

Computers Display Drivers Graphics Cards Linux Gaming Memory Motherboards Processors Software Storage Operating Systems Peripherals

Google Cloud C4D Performance Benchmarks At The Top-End Show 39% Generational Improvement With EPYC Turin

Written by Michael Larabel in Cloud on 13 June 2025 at 12:00 PM EDT. Page 5 of 6. Add A Comment.

👁 PyTorch benchmark with settings of Device: CPU, Batch Size: 512, Model: ResNet-50. c4d-standard-384 was the fastest.

👁 PyTorch benchmark with settings of Device: CPU, Batch Size: 512, Model: ResNet-152. c4d-standard-384 was the fastest.

👁 TensorFlow benchmark with settings of Device: CPU, Batch Size: 512, Model: ResNet-50. c4d-standard-384 was the fastest.

👁 OpenVINO benchmark with settings of Model: Person Detection FP16, Device: CPU. c4d-standard-384 was the fastest.

👁 OpenVINO benchmark with settings of Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8, Device: CPU. c4d-standard-384 was the fastest.

👁 OpenVINO benchmark with settings of Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8, Device: CPU. c4d-standard-384 was the fastest.

👁 OpenVINO benchmark with settings of Model: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8, Device: CPU. c4d-standard-384 was the fastest.

👁 OpenVINO benchmark with settings of Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8, Device: CPU. c4d-standard-384 was the fastest.

👁 OpenVINO benchmark with settings of Model: Person Re-Identification Retail FP16, Device: CPU. c4d-standard-384 was the fastest.

👁 OpenVINO GenAI benchmark with settings of Model: Gemma-7b-int4-ov, Device: CPU. c4d-standard-384 was the fastest.

👁 OpenVINO GenAI benchmark with settings of Model: Falcon-7b-instruct-int4-ov, Device: CPU. c4d-standard-384 was the fastest.

👁 Llama.cpp benchmark with settings of Backend: CPU BLAS, Model: Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3-Q8_0, Test: Text Generation 128. c4d-standard-384 was the fastest.

👁 Llama.cpp benchmark with settings of Backend: CPU BLAS, Model: Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3-Q8_0, Test: Prompt Processing 2048. c4d-standard-384 was the fastest.

👁 Llama.cpp benchmark with settings of Backend: CPU BLAS, Model: granite-3.0-3b-a800m-instruct-Q8_0, Test: Prompt Processing 2048. c4d-standard-384 was the fastest.

For those interested in CPU-based AI inferencing, the c4d-standard-384 also demonstrated great generational uplift from the c3d-standard-360.

Add A Comment - Next Page

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Page

Evaluating The Performance Cost To AMD SEV-SNP On Modern EPYC VMs

Google Axion CPU Performance With The New Google Cloud N4A Instances

The Incredible Evolution Of AMD EPYC HPC Performance Shown In The Azure Cloud

Google Cloud N4D Delivers Great VM Performance & Value Powered By AMD EPYC Turin

Benchmarking The AMD EPYC 9V64H: Azure HBv5's Custom AMD CPU With HBM3

AMD EPYC Turin vs. Intel Xeon 6 Granite Rapids vs. Graviton4 Benchmarks With AWS M8 Instances

Support Phoronix
While Having Ad-Free Browsing,
Single-Page Article Viewing

Legal Disclaimer, Privacy Policy, Cookies | | Contact
Copyright © 2004 - 2026 by Phoronix Media.
All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.