AWS Graviton4 96-Core Performance vs. AMD EPYC & Intel Xeon CPU Benchmarks

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 18 July 2024 at 12:00 PM EDT. Page 3 of 5. 21 Comments.

👁 PostgreSQL benchmark with settings of Scaling Factor: 100, Clients: 1000, Mode: Read Only. EPYC 9684X 96 Cores was the fastest.

👁 PostgreSQL benchmark with settings of Scaling Factor: 100, Clients: 1000, Mode: Read Only, Average Latency. EPYC 9684X 96 Cores was the fastest.

For the PostgreSQL database server when focusing on read workloads, the Graviton4 processor was positioned just behind the AMD EPYC Genoa(X) and Bergamo processors.

👁 RocksDB benchmark with settings of Test: Random Read. Xeon 6780E 144 Cores was the fastest.

👁 RocksDB benchmark with settings of Test: Read While Writing. EPYC 9754 128 Cores was the fastest.

With RocksDB the Graviton4 performance was competitive with the AMD EPYC Genoa/Bergamo and Intel Xeon 6 Sierra Forest single socket results.

👁 Speedb benchmark with settings of Test: Random Read. Xeon 6780E 144 Cores was the fastest.

👁 Speedb benchmark with settings of Test: Read While Writing. EPYC 9754 128 Cores was the fastest.

Likewise Speedb was showing competitive Graviton4 performance against the x86_64 competition in raw performance.

21 Comments - Next Page

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next Page

URL: https://www.phoronix.com/review/graviton4-96-core/3

⇱ AWS Graviton4 96-Core Performance vs. AMD EPYC & Intel Xeon CPU Benchmarks Review - Phoronix

AWS Graviton4 96-Core Performance vs. AMD EPYC & Intel Xeon CPU Benchmarks