AWS Graviton4 96-Core Performance vs. AMD EPYC & Intel Xeon CPU Benchmarks

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 18 July 2024 at 12:00 PM EDT. Page 4 of 5. 21 Comments.

👁 Coremark benchmark with settings of CoreMark Size 666, Iterations Per Second. EPYC 9754 128 Cores was the fastest.

👁 ACES DGEMM benchmark with settings of Sustained Floating-Point Rate. Amazon Graviton4 96 Cores was the fastest.

The Graviton4 96 core metal instance pulled a surprising first place finish with the ACES DGEMM HPC benchmark.

👁 miniFE benchmark with settings of Problem Size: Small. Amazon Graviton4 96 Cores was the fastest.

👁 CloverLeaf benchmark with settings of Input: clover_bm16. Amazon Graviton4 96 Cores was the fastest.

The Graviton4 instance was performing great in other HPC workloads too, which will be interesting to re-visit following the upcoming launch of Intel Xeon 6 Granite Rapids and AMD EPYC Turin.

👁 QuantLib benchmark with settings of Configuration: Multi-Threaded. EPYC 9754 128 Cores was the fastest.

The Graviton4 performance was in good shape for the QuantLib quantitative finance computations.

21 Comments - Next Page

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next Page

URL: https://www.phoronix.com/review/graviton4-96-core/4

⇱ AWS Graviton4 96-Core Performance vs. AMD EPYC & Intel Xeon CPU Benchmarks Review - Phoronix

AWS Graviton4 96-Core Performance vs. AMD EPYC & Intel Xeon CPU Benchmarks