VOOZH about

URL: https://www.phoronix.com/review/nvidia-grace-epyc-turin/2

⇱ NVIDIA GH200 Grace CPU vs. AMD EPYC 9005 Turin CPU Performance Review - Phoronix


👁 Phoronix

NVIDIA GH200 Grace CPU vs. AMD EPYC 9005 Turin CPU Performance

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 7 November 2024 at 12:37 PM EST. Page 2 of 5. 20 Comments.

The 72-core NVIDIA Grace CPU was trailing the tested AMD EPYC 9005 series processors with the ClickHouse database server performance.

But on a power efficiency basis, the GH200 Grace CPU did have a sizable lead in performance-per-Watt.

Memcached was performing much better on the EPYC Zen 5 processors than the GH200 but on a performance-per-Watt basis wasn't too far behind.

With the RocksDB database random read test, the GH200 was successfully competing with the EPYC 9655 96-core processor.

This also allowed the GH200 GPTshop.ai system to deliver the best CPU performance-per-Watt in RocksDB.

It was a similar story with the Speedb key-value storage engine.