VOOZH about

URL: https://www.phoronix.com/review/nvidia-grace-epyc-turin/5

⇱ NVIDIA GH200 Grace CPU vs. AMD EPYC 9005 Turin CPU Performance Review - Phoronix


👁 Phoronix

NVIDIA GH200 Grace CPU vs. AMD EPYC 9005 Turin CPU Performance

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 7 November 2024 at 12:37 PM EST. Page 5 of 5. 20 Comments.

Those wanting to see even more benchmarks and go through all of the performance data, CPU power consumption / performance-per-Watt, and performance per core/thread metrics in full can do so via this result page for all of the raw data across nearly 50 benchmarks.

When looking at the performance of the NVIDIA Grace CPU on the GH200 with 72 cores based on the Arm Neoverse-V2, that is how the raw CPU performance comes down up against the AMD EPYC Zen 5 from 64 to 128 cores of the Turin classic cores. The Grace CPU results were much more competitive when looking at the power efficiency. Of course, the main selling point of the GH200 Superchip is when leveraging the Hopper GPU in tandem to which will be for a future article now having remote access again thanks to GPTshop.ai. But for those curious how well Grace / Neoverse-V2 compares to the new EPYC 9005 series in single socket configurations, hopefully today's numbers provided some insight.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.