VOOZH about

URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Emily_Manning

⇱ Talk:Emily Manning - Wikipedia


Jump to content
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
πŸ‘ Image

Emily Manning is currently a Language and literature good article nominee. Nominated by MCE89 (talk) at 13:29, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

This article is ready to be reviewed in accordance with the good article criteria. Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review the article and decide if it should be listed as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and then save the page. See the instructions.

πŸ‘ Image
A fact from Emily Manning appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 April 2026 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
  • Did you know... that Emily Manning used a poetic dialogue between a husband and his clairvoyant wife to examine Victorian gender roles?
A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Did you know archive/2026/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Emily Manning.
πŸ‘ icon
Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as , or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by TarnishedPath (talk04:35, 15 April 2026 (UTC)[]

  • ... that Emily Manning used a poetic dialogue between a husband and his clairvoyant wife to examine Victorian gender roles?
  • Source: Webby, Elizabeth (1988). "Some Nineteenth-Century Women Poets". In Adelaide, Debra (ed.). A Bright and Fiery Troop: Australian Women Writers of the Nineteenth Century. Ringwood: Penguin Books. pp. 41–52. ISBN 978-0-14-011238-2. Its hero, Theodore, complains about his hard lot but is taught acceptance by his wife Agatha. A clairvoyant, she conjures up scenes from many other lives to demonstrate that he is not alone in his pain. and Hansord, Katie (2021). "Emily Manning: Spiritualism and Periodical Print Culture: 1860–80". Colonial Australian Women Poets: Political Voice and Feminist Traditions. New York: Anthem Press. pp. 111–138. ISBN 9781785272691. In attributing to the wife a defence of religious faith, Manning's poem falls in line with the common practice of representing a split between religious and political (or rationalist) discourses in gendered terms. However, in approaching poetic voice through dramatic dialogue, Manning's poem encompasses discourses outside the acceptably feminine space of domestic ideology and engages in what Murphy argues was an ethical religious crisis in the nineteenth century... Particularly, Manning's use of theatrical dialogue in this poem, in which the husband and wife are engaged in debate around theological discourses, suggests the significance of these themes to gender roles around motherhood and marriage.
5x expanded by MCE89 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 23 past nominations.

MCE89 (talk) 13:29, 31 March 2026 (UTC).[]

  • πŸ‘ Image
    New enough (5x expansion), long enough, presentable. Reliable sources used throughout and cited inline. Copyvio Detector comes back clear. Hook is interesting, cited appropriately and confirmed by the source. QPQ done. No image submitted with the nomination but, if added, the image from the article's infobox is appropriately licensed and clear at small size and is thus approved for use on DYK. Good work! Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:52, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[]