![]() |
VOOZH | about |
Local LLM Performance: 32.7 t/s average on 14B models at 16k context. Updated Benchmarks: March 2026.
32.7T/s
1,356T/s
In our 2026 testing, we found the RTX 4070 occupies a difficult spot for local LLM enthusiasts. While the card demonstrates excellent raw speed—achieving nearly 33 t/s on Qwen3 14B thanks to its GDDR6X memory—the 12GB VRAM limitation restricts usability to smaller models. Despite the performance metrics, we believe the price point makes it less attractive compared to 16GB alternatives like the RTX 4060 Ti or RTX 5060 Ti, which offer similar inference speeds but significantly more room for larger models or longer contexts.
$450
Avg. Market Value
The models below represent the largest language models that fit fully in VRAM on this GPU using 4-bit quantization (GGUF). Benchmarks include token generation and prompt processing speeds measured at their maximum supported context length.
Note: Context values are grouped into standard tiers (4K, 16K, 32K, 64K, 128K). Models may support slightly higher context, but they remain in the lower tier unless they reach the next bracket.
Compare prompt ingestion and token generation speeds against similar GPUs across widely used local models and extended context lengths up to 256K.
Prompt processing (t/s) and token generation speed (t/s) across different open weight models and context lengths.
| Model | 4k Ctx | 16k Ctx | 32k Ctx | 64k Ctx | 128k Ctx | 256k Ctx |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 8B (Q4_K) | 3,564.1 | 2,064.3 | 1,116.7 | — | — | — |
| Qwen3 14B (Q4_K) | 2,099.9 | 1,355.8 | — | — | — | — |
| Model | 4k Ctx | 16k Ctx | 32k Ctx | 64k Ctx | 128k Ctx | 256k Ctx |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 8B (Q4_K) | 71.2 | 52.1 | 38.1 | — | — | — |
| Qwen3 14B (Q4_K) | 42.5 | 32.7 | — | — | — | — |
Common questions about running LLMs on the RTX 4070.