![]() |
VOOZH | about |
Local LLM Performance: 40.6 t/s average on 14B models at 16k context. Updated Benchmarks: March 2026.
40.6T/s
1,315T/s
In our 2026 analysis, we found the RTX 5070 to be a poor value proposition for local LLMs. Despite featuring the newer GDDR7 memory standard, the 12GB VRAM limitation at a current price point is a major bottleneck. If you are strictly running models that fit within 12GB, we believe it is much more cost-effective to buy an RTX 4070; alternatively, for this budget, we recommend spending slightly more to acquire a 16GB card, which opens up access to the 20B+ model tier.
$650
Avg. Market Value
The models below represent the largest language models that fit fully in VRAM on this GPU using 4-bit quantization (GGUF). Benchmarks include token generation and prompt processing speeds measured at their maximum supported context length.
Note: Context values are grouped into standard tiers (4K, 16K, 32K, 64K, 128K). Models may support slightly higher context, but they remain in the lower tier unless they reach the next bracket.
Compare prompt ingestion and token generation speeds against similar GPUs across widely used local models and extended context lengths up to 256K.
Prompt processing (t/s) and token generation speed (t/s) across different open weight models and context lengths.
| Model | 4k Ctx | 16k Ctx | 32k Ctx | 64k Ctx | 128k Ctx | 256k Ctx |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 8B (Q4_K) | 3,487.7 | 1,600.8 | 898.8 | — | — | — |
| Qwen3 14B (Q4_K) | 2,144.2 | 1,315.2 | — | — | — | — |
| Model | 4k Ctx | 16k Ctx | 32k Ctx | 64k Ctx | 128k Ctx | 256k Ctx |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 8B (Q4_K) | 85.8 | 59.1 | 43.6 | — | — | — |
| Qwen3 14B (Q4_K) | 54.2 | 40.6 | — | — | — | — |
Common questions about running LLMs on the RTX 5070.