AMD EPYC 4004 Benchmarks: Outperforming Intel Xeon E-2400 With Performance, Efficiency & Value

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 21 May 2024 at 09:00 AM EDT. Page 14 of 16. 22 Comments.

👁 TensorFlow benchmark with settings of Device: CPU, Batch Size: 32, Model: ResNet-50. EPYC 4584PX was the fastest.

If considering budget server CPU options for edge AI deployments or similar, the EPYC 4004 line-up with AVX-512 support was providing great performance and value.

👁 PyTorch benchmark with settings of Device: CPU, Batch Size: 64, Model: ResNet-50. EPYC 4584PX was the fastest.

WIth PyTorch, the Xeon E-2488 was struggling to compete with the EPYC 4244P 6-core processor.

👁 OpenVINO benchmark with settings of Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8, Device: CPU. EPYC 4564P was the fastest.

👁 OpenVINO benchmark with settings of Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8, Device: CPU. EPYC 4564P was the fastest.

👁 OpenVINO benchmark with settings of Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8, Device: CPU. EPYC 4564P was the fastest.

👁 OpenVINO benchmark with settings of Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16, Device: CPU. EPYC 4584PX was the fastest.

The AMD EPYC 4004 series processors were sweeping through all of the AI benchmarks thanks to the Zen 4 AVX-512 support.

22 Comments - Next Page

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next Page

URL: https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-epyc-4004/14

⇱ AMD EPYC 4004 Benchmarks: Outperforming Intel Xeon E-2400 With Performance, Efficiency & Value Review - Phoronix

AMD EPYC 4004 Benchmarks: Outperforming Intel Xeon E-2400 With Performance, Efficiency & Value