AWS Graviton4 vs. AmpereOne 192-Core Benchmarks For Leading AArch64 Server Performance
With the ClickHouse database server the Graviton4 192-core performance returned to far exceeding the performance of the AmpereOne A192-32X server being tested. Granted, with the Graviton4 cloud access we don't have any access to be able to see the CPU or system level power consumption for seeing how the power efficiency is comparing to Ampere Computing's wares.
With PostgreSQL performance we see AmpereOne delivering modestly better performance over Graviton4. Part of the stark difference here compared to ClickHouse is that Graviton4 is in a dual socket configuration and out-of-the-box for PostgreSQL if not resorting to NUMA pinning its performance can sometimes suffer compared to AmpereOne A192-32X being in a single socket.
Graviton4 was offering slightly better performance meanwhile for Memcached.
Graviton4 was offering much stronger performance in random read scenarios for RocksDB and the RocksDB-compatible Speedb databases.