AWS Graviton4 vs. AmpereOne 192-Core Benchmarks For Leading AArch64 Server Performance

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 9 September 2024 at 11:15 AM EDT. Page 6 of 8. 7 Comments.

👁 NAS Parallel Benchmarks benchmark with settings of Test / Class: EP.D. Graviton4 192 vCPUs was the fastest.

👁 NAS Parallel Benchmarks benchmark with settings of Test / Class: SP.C. Graviton4 192 vCPUs was the fastest.

👁 NAS Parallel Benchmarks benchmark with settings of Test / Class: IS.D. Graviton4 192 vCPUs was the fastest.

👁 NWChem benchmark with settings of Input: C240 Buckyball. Graviton4 192 vCPUs was the fastest.

👁 Xcompact3d Incompact3d benchmark with settings of Input: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d. Graviton4 192 vCPUs was the fastest.

👁 OpenFOAM benchmark with settings of Input: drivaerFastback, Small Mesh Size, Execution Time. Graviton4 192 vCPUs was the fastest.

👁 OpenFOAM benchmark with settings of Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size, Mesh Time. Graviton4 192 vCPUs was the fastest.

👁 OpenFOAM benchmark with settings of Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size, Execution Time. Graviton4 192 vCPUs was the fastest.

Going into this testing I wasn't expecting the 192 vCPU Graviton4 to deliver such striking leads over AmpereOne given the same core counts, etc. Plus the AmpereOne being tested as a straight-up local bare metal server. Alas Graviton4 isn't available for on-premise deployments for then being able to measure the CPU/system power consumption access or being able to accurately compare on pricing.

7 Comments - Next Page

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next Page

URL: https://www.phoronix.com/review/ampereone-aws-graviton4/6

⇱ AWS Graviton4 vs. AmpereOne 192-Core Benchmarks For Leading AArch64 Server Performance - Phoronix

AWS Graviton4 vs. AmpereOne 192-Core Benchmarks For Leading AArch64 Server Performance