AI Brand Monitor: GEO / AI Search Visibility Tracker
Pricing
Pay per event
AI Brand Monitor: GEO / AI Search Visibility Tracker
Track how your brand appears in AI answers across ChatGPT, Gemini & Claude. Measure mention rate, share-of-voice vs competitors, ranking & cited sources โ with multi-sample reliability. GEO / AEO visibility data for SEO agencies, brand & PR teams. Pay-as-you-go.
Pricing
Pay per event
Rating
0.0
(0)
Developer
Actor stats
0
Bookmarked
3
Total users
2
Monthly active users
10 days ago
Last modified
Share
๐ AI Brand Monitor โ GEO / AI Search Visibility Tracker
AI Brand Monitor โ GEO / AI Search Visibility Tracker
๐ GEO / AEO
๐ Engines
๐ Reliability
๐ Setup
๐ MCP
Is your brand recommended by ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude โ or are your competitors?
Buyers no longer "Google it." They ask an AI. When someone asks "what's the best project management software?", the AI names a handful of brands โ and if yours isn't one of them, you lost that customer before you ever saw them. This is the new SEO, and it's called GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) / AEO (Answer Engine Optimization).
This Actor measures, with statistical rigor, exactly how visible your brand is inside AI answers โ and tells you what to do about it.
Why this tracker is different
Most AI-visibility tools ask each question once and report the result as if it were the truth. But AI answers are non-deterministic โ ask the same question three times and you can get three different brand lists. A single-shot check is noise dressed up as data.
| Typical trackers | AI Brand Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling | Ask once per prompt | Ask N times, report a mention RATE + stability |
| Reliability | A coin-flip snapshot | Statistically grounded, repeatable score |
| Cited sources | Opaque redirect URLs / titles | Real publisher domains (g2.com, wrike.comโฆ) |
| Actionability | "Improve your visibility" | Citation-gap list: the exact domains to earn citations on next |
| Sentiment | Sometimes | Positive / neutral / critical, on the brand's actual context |
We ran the same prompt 3ร during testing and watched the mention rate move between runs. That variance is real โ and it's exactly why one-shot tools mislead. We report the rate and the stability, so you know how much to trust each number.
What you get
For a brand + category (and optional competitors), the Actor sends realistic buyer-intent prompts to AI engines with live web search enabled, samples each prompt multiple times, and returns:
Per prompt (one row each):
- Mention rate % โ in how many samples your brand appeared
- Stability % โ how consistent that outcome was across samples
- Average rank โ where your brand lands among the brands the AI lists
- Sentiment โ how the AI describes your brand (positive / neutral / critical)
- Competitors mentioned โ who you're up against in that answer
- Cited sources โ the real domains the AI grounded its answer on
- Answer excerpt โ the raw AI response, for evidence
Summary scorecard (one row):
- AI Visibility Index (0โ100) โ one headline score (mention rate 50% + rank 30% + citation rate 20%), with a band: strong (70+) / mid-tier / visibility gap
- Trend โ ฮ vs. your previous run for the same brand, so scheduled runs show whether you're gaining or losing ground
- AI visibility % โ overall mention rate across all samples and engines
- Share of voice % โ your mentions vs. each competitor
- Overall sentiment + breakdown
- Citation rate โ how often AI engines cite your own domain as a source (add your
brandDomain) - Top cited sources โ the domains shaping answers in your category
- Citation gap โ domains that ground competitor-only answers where you're absent. This is your GEO to-do list: earn a presence on these and you move the needle.
Built for automation & AI agents
- Webhooks / alerts โ set a
webhookUrland we POST the full scorecard to Slack, Make, Zapier or n8n the moment a run finishes. - Schedule it โ pair with Apify Scheduler for weekly tracking; the trend delta does the rest.
- Agent-friendly inputs โ accepts the field names AI agents use interchangeably (
brand/brandName/company,competitors/rivals,engines/llms,prompts/questions).
Use it as an MCP tool (inside any AI agent โ no install)
Call this Actor directly from Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT agents, LangChain, Make, Zapier or n8n via the Model Context Protocol:
Hosted (zero setup) โ point your MCP client at:
https://mcp.apify.com?tools=foxlabs/ai-brand-monitor
Self-hosted (stdio clients โ Claude Desktop, Cursor, Cline, Continue):
$npx @apify/actors-mcp-server --tools foxlabs/ai-brand-monitor
{"mcpServers":{"ai-brand-monitor":{"command":"npx","args":["-y","@apify/actors-mcp-server","--tools","foxlabs/ai-brand-monitor"],"env":{"APIFY_TOKEN":"YOUR_APIFY_TOKEN"}}}}
Your agent can then ask "How visible is Notion in AI search?" and get the scorecard back inline.
Quick start
- Enter your brand (e.g.
Notion) and category (e.g.project management software). - (Optional) Add competitors to benchmark against.
- Run it.
That's it โ no API keys, no setup. Sensible defaults are pre-filled.
{"brand":"Notion","category":"project management software","competitors":["Asana","Trello","ClickUp","Monday.com"],"engines":["gemini","openai","anthropic"],"maxPromptsPerEngine":5,"samplesPerPrompt":3}
Engines
| Engine | Status |
|---|---|
| Gemini (Google) โ live Google Search grounding | โ Supported out of the box, no setup |
| ChatGPT (OpenAI) โ live web search | โ Supported out of the box, no setup |
| Claude (Anthropic) โ live web search | โ Supported out of the box, no setup |
| Perplexity | ๐ Bring your own API key |
Three engines run with zero setup โ Gemini, ChatGPT and Claude, each with real-time web search enabled. To also query Perplexity, paste your own Perplexity API key in the Advanced inputs; it runs on your account.
Engines disagree more than you'd think. In our own testing, Gemini and ChatGPT both recommended Notion for "project management software" โ but Claude didn't mention it at all. Tracking multiple engines is the whole point: your visibility isn't one number, it's different on every surface.
Input reference
| Field | What it does |
|---|---|
brand | The brand to track in AI answers |
category | Product category โ used to auto-generate realistic buyer prompts |
competitors | Brands to benchmark share-of-voice against |
engines | Which AI engines to query (Gemini supported by default) |
maxPromptsPerEngine | How many buyer-intent prompts (1โ25). More = broader coverage |
samplesPerPrompt | How many times to repeat each prompt (1โ5). More = more reliable |
prompts | (Advanced) Your own exact prompts, overriding auto-generation |
*ApiKey | (Advanced) Bring your own key per engine |
How it works (transparent by design)
- Prompt generation โ realistic buyer-intent questions are built from your category (or you supply your own).
- Multi-sample querying โ each prompt is sent to each engine
samplesPerPrompttimes, with live web search on. - Deterministic analysis โ brand and competitor mentions are detected by exact token matching (no fuzzy guessing); rank is the order brands appear in; sentiment is classified from the sentences that mention your brand.
- Aggregation โ mention rate, stability, share-of-voice, sentiment, cited sources and the citation gap are computed across all samples.
No scraping, no cookie tricks โ only official AI provider APIs.
A note on sentiment (v1): sentiment is classified with a transparent, deterministic keyword model over the brand's mention context. It's a fast, explainable signal โ not a black-box LLM judgment.
Who it's for
- SEO / GEO agencies โ sell evidence-backed AI-visibility reports to clients (recurring).
- Brand & marketing teams โ track your standing vs. competitors over time.
- Founders โ find out, today, whether AI is recommending you or your rivals.
Schedule it weekly to watch your AI visibility trend โ because the answers change, and so should your strategy.
Built by foXLabs.
