Forum:Update pages should have history sections

This means pages like Tricky Trials should have a history section. i.e. Tricky Trials § History.

I noticed Revision 2552091 by BDJP007301, and realized that Tricky Trials does not have a history section. The reverted infomation would go in the history section, like this:

Here is an example of what some of the history table could look like. I'm not sure whether expanding this to include every change to the "Update 1.21" experimental toggle / data-pack, and every 1.21 snapshot and preview, would be a good idea, but I think a history section for some basic information would be good at least.

{"type": "", "version": "October 15, 2023", "exp": "", "snap": "", "content": "Update 1.21 was announced at (link to Minecraft Live 2023 article, displayed as Minecraft Live 2023). The theme of the update is \"(link to combat article, displayed as combat) adventures, and tinkering\"."}

{"type": "", "version": "April 26, 2024", "exp": "", "snap": "", "content": "\"Update 1.21\" was given its official name: \"Tricky Trials\"."}

--Simanelix ^(T|C) 03:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

👁 Image
 Comment As much as I appreciate the idea, I have to ask: what should we note per each update that isn't already noted on the main prose? Sure we have stuff like the Caves & Cliff split, but The Wild Update? The Update That Changed the World? I don't know if having a history section about these update will have any information relevant enough for said history section, especially what we got was what he had in those update. -- PanchamBro (talk • contributions) 03:52, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Yea, maybe it's just not a good idea, since we have all of the information somewhere on our wiki anyways. --Simanelix ^(T|C) 05:09, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

👁 Image
 Oppose, this should be dealt with in the prose.  Nixinova   T   C   09:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)