This page is absolutely unimportant and useless. Do you think anyone will need it because of 2 mobs, a block that is not even called dryed baby ghast and 2 mobs from addons? Moreover, this page completely loses its meaning, since there is Ghast (disambiguation). I will do my best to have this nonsense delete. Buzzilaa (talk) 17:48, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- I dont think its particularly useless, nor should it be tagged for deletion? Its not hurting anyone by existing
👁 Image
amethyst_hhh 👁 Image
(t)(survey) 17:50, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Remember. Ghast (disambiguation). And also Ghastling is not a separate mob from Happy Ghast Buzzilaa (talk) 17:53, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Disambiguation pages aren’t determined by mob, but by name. Realshow19 (talk) 18:29, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Baby Ghast is a redirect to a section which links back to this page. Therefore I think it's completely valid to have this disambiguation. | violine1101 (talk) 17:55, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Baby Ghast should lead to the page of this mob in the dungeon namespace, since baby HAPPY Ghasts are called Ghastlings Buzzilaa (talk) 17:59, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- People are still going to search "baby ghast" and migjt get mad/upset when it takes them to some random dungeons mob
👁 Image
amethyst_hhh 👁 Image
(t)(survey) 18:06, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- No - if someone comes across the mob in the game, they don't necessarily know what it's called and would just search for "baby ghast" here on the wiki. That should lead them to the right place. | violine1101 (talk) 18:06, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Then the baby HAPPY ghast page should lead to the HAPPY GHAST page Buzzilaa (talk) 18:08, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- It already does. But people also don't necessarily know that the happy ghast is called happy ghast. | violine1101 (talk) 18:10, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- This can easily be found out via commands/creative mode/when a tamed ghast is killed. So you are trying to justify the existence of this nonsense page Buzzilaa (talk) 18:14, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- We shouldn't expect our readers to know commands, use creative mode, or kill happy ghasts. They come to the wiki to learn about the game - if they already know about the game anyway, they have no reason for coming here. | violine1101 (talk) 18:17, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, Im putting this as niceley as possible, but you are severely overestimating the general public
👁 Image
amethyst_hhh 👁 Image
(t)(survey) 18:19, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- even if so, what's the problem with just leading to Ghast (disambiguation) Buzzilaa (talk) 18:22, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- I dont see a problem with that, but if someone else feels that this should be its own page, then, personally, I'd just leave it as is
👁 Image
amethyst_hhh 👁 Image
(t)(survey) 18:25, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- I am against it. It is simply an increase in the number of pages, and in such a talentless way. Let's now create pages Zombie villager (disambiguation), Cave spider (disambiguation) because they will also be very useful and necessary. Buzzilaa (talk) 18:32, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- The general Ghast disambiguation features a lot of things that are not relevant to baby ghasts, making it more difficult to find what you're actually looking for. | violine1101 (talk) 18:28, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- the very first section of the Ghast disambiguation page lists 90% of the content of this page Buzzilaa (talk) 18:35, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- we can remove that then and put it as == see also == Baby Ghast (disambiguation) similar to how many disambiguation pages act 👁 Image
Ayaan 22:22, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Could work. Gwen Stacy (talk) 14:06, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
- No, it still has its usefulness. There are many baby ghast references which suffices to have its own separate category. Just because it falls under a broader subject doesnt mean it should be negated 👁 Image
Ayaan 22:24, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- This disambiguation page is perfectly fine. "Baby ghast" can be ambiguous and, unlike the general ghast disambig page, this doesn't list irrelevant entries.--Capopanzo (talk | contribs) 22:43, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
