Talk:Granular material

This article really serves no purpose, being a pedantic mess of a category. Since Minecraft is not real life, it is impossible to say if a block or item is truly granular material. Additionally, this page's name was solely created to combine Dust and Powder articles. However, these exist as standalone disambiguation pages, causing duplication and lack of maintenance for this page, not being fully up to date with the other pages. 👁 Image
Ayaan 19:48, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

I 👁 Image
 Oppose deleting this page immediately, but 👁 Image
 Support merging the information on this page to other pages first.Drour1234 (talk) 19:51, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

This page is actually outdated lol. There is nothing to add. 👁 Image
Ayaan 19:53, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Now it is outdated since I just moved some information exclusively on this page to other pages. As such, I now 👁 Image
 Support your deletion nomination.Drour1234 (talk) 20:01, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

I would disagree adding those to the pages but that's for another discussion (after this ends). 👁 Image
Ayaan 07:27, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
 Support There is no need to be this ahem..granular about disambigs. They should only be for what could be legitimately confused. Going overboard and trying to play a game of word association is just completely out of scope of what these pages are for.  Nixinova  T ⁄ C  19:51, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
 Agreed, a lot of disambigs feel like they were made for the sake of existing. Realshow19 (talk) 20:55, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
 Agree. –LauraFi - talk 21:08, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
 Support | violine1101 ^(talk) 21:03, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
 Support - Ssysi - talk 07:35, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
 Support 👁 Image
Ja17 07:38, 7 November 2025 (UTC)