User talk:Drour1234

You are not an administrator to decide that YOUR layout is better than the old one, if you want to change it, go consult the administrators first! You do not have the right to impose your new layout on the page. <- Rogerio980Pizzaa (talk) 17:28, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Neither of us are administers. I stated that I thought my layout was better. I did not state that my opinion is better than everyone else’s. Everyone can edit on the wiki. Me and you. You don’t need to revert all of my edits. Simply read through my edit and change specific things. Also, Minecraft Dungeons is not Minecraft and just because the layout of the vanilla mob page works for vanilla Minecraft doesn’t mean it would work for Dungeons and Earth. The vanilla layout for dungeons is very unorganized as simply categorizing the page as passive neutral and hostile won’t work for Dungeons as it is a separate genre from Minecraft. Minecraft is a sandbox game and Dungeons is a dungeon crawling rpg. Drour1234 (), 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Hey, what about this type of layout that is on my page? It has the classifications and is not repetitive https://minecraft.wiki/w/User:Rogerio980Pizzaa?profile=no

I like some of it. However, I think that there is some further revision that needs to be done, but it is a good start.

Dude, that is becoming a mess, just leave the Non-alive like it was before, and will mark the non-attackable page to be deleted, since it's not important. Also, you should know that u can't move a page to another that already exists

I saw in this edit that you lowercased all instances of boss mobs. Why? Shouldn't they be capitalized? Amatulic (talk) 22:55, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Are they really needed? A majority of the information regarding the events are already mentioned in their respective sections, plus any additional information shown during the event is already mentioned on other pages (e.g. Minecraft Dungeons when it was first announced). BDJP ^(t|c) 16:44, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

If you remove it, can you please at least find a way to keep the two links in that section? – Unsigned comment added by Drour1234 ( • contribs) at 16:47, 11 October 2021 (UTC). Sign comments with ~~~~

First link is already included as a reference. Second link isn't needed as a link to the YT video is already included as a reference. BDJP ^(t|c) 16:58, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

You may have met me before, I am Alan. an Minecraft Dungeons editor. My English are not well, hope you don't be mind. I have many discoveries and screenshot of illageralt and MCD content. I wanna share with you but no way to give. Do you have any contact app such as discord? I know we both have the passion of MCD, But I really need your help, please. (talk), 08:32, 26 October 2021.

Hi, I have noticed you. Unfortunately, I do not have that many ways of communication. I thought that the screenshots that you had uploaded already onto the wiki were good screenshots. About what you said about your English, I don’t see how that is a huge problem. While some of your grammar in your edits are not that good, I can clearly understand what you say in them. In any case, if it bothers you, I do occasionally make edits improving grammar so your English really isn’t a huge problem. Thanks for letting me know all of this! I am looking foreword to seeing what other discoveries you made about Illageralt! Drour1234 (), 26 October 2021 (UTC)

I'd love to share my findings with you, I've been learning to render model with blender from Oakar since last week. I've even found where the actual model files for Redstone Sentry are hidden, and I've also found more Illageralt textures along the way. Unfortunately I can't describe them one by one because I don't know what they are, and I'm busy to re-render mobs recent (First re-render would be vindicator). So I still need your help to arrange the discoveries. Also I have been discuss about "Armored mobs officially". I recommend you to create an article as mob family type to introduce them like illager, undead or piglin. Alan(talk), 28 June 2022 (UTC)

The armored mobs do not have an official name, so each armored mob page should be labeled as conjecture, however, I do not have the time to do so. I do not think that a mob family type page is needed. Drour1234 (), 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Just come here and share a little trick on a talk page, enter 4 "~" symbols at the end of the article to quickly sign your username and automatically append UTC time lol. Alan (talk) 11:29, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

About the mobs in the MCD locations, if your going to leave like it was in the old format, remove the non-mob entities and the cinematic mobs, no need to list them. Rogerio980Pizzaa (talk) 18:33, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

The non mob entities and the cinematic mobs do appear in the missions as entities appear alongside mobs and cinematics do have mobs not found in the mission itself, and also cinematics are part of the game so they should be included. If you have a better idea for how to List cinematic mobs and entities, post in the talk page of the mission. In my mind, they should still appear on mission pages. Also, thank you for letting me know your thoughts on the matter through the talk page. Drour1234 (), 31 October 2021 (UTC)

• I made a new category for the cutscene entities. Rogerio980Pizzaa (talk) 11:55, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
• And i will remove the non-mob entities since they are just part of the real mob behavior, example, everytime a evoker spawns, the player will know that fangs will appear, that's obvious, arrows are entities, but they don't need to be listed everytime a skeleton is listed, that's just, unnecessary. Rogerio980Pizzaa (talk) 12:06, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

It might seem obvious to you and me, but to some people it isn’t so obvious. In dungeons, arrows are actually not entities. Drour1234 (), 1 November 2021 (UTC)

• If you want them so bad, then just add the a ref (this mob summons geomancer walls and bombs). And how do you know that arrows are not entities, do you have proof? Rogerio980Pizzaa (talk) 12:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

If I do that, could you also do that rather than outright removing the information? Drour1234 (), 1 November 2021 (UTC)

• Sure. Rogerio980Pizzaa (talk) 12:35, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

In regards to Ancient Debris, no other block article on the wiki has a reference to a "Block of the Week" article covering that particular block. There is simply no need for information from such an article to be included or confirmed when the information that is on the wiki article is all available either through the game or reliably sourced. BDJP ^(t|c) 22:36, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Also, if I may add, the tweet that you are referencing about the article does not state any information about the texture of ancient debris. Not even the video corresponding the tweet mentions such information. BDJP ^(t|c) 22:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

I consider the block of the week article series to be more reliable than posts by Mojang employees. After all, many employees may have different opinions. It should be in-game, then the official twitter where Minecraft articles are, then Mojang employees. The writers of the different articles are no less payed to do that than the coders of the game. The articles are part of the Minecraft universe over individual twitter posts. The individual twitter posts were made by individual Mojang employees outside of their job. Drour1234 (|c), 11 November 2021 (UTC)

I’m sorry, but honestly I feel like you have your information backwards. The game developers, artists, etc. should be the primary source to use if information can’t be verified in-game. While, yes, employees may have different opinions. it should also be of note that the information you referenced regarding the texture was confirmed over a year earlier by the artist who had worked on the texture for the block itself. The official Twitter account (and in addition, articles on the Minecraft website) should not be used as a detour, but only as a last resort if no other reliable source is available.

I also strongly disagree that articles on the site are part of the Minecraft universe. A good majority of them don’t even talk about blocks or items, but instead about game updates, community members, info on the latest products, etc. Regarding your opinion that Twitter posts from developers are done outside of their job, I also strongly disagree with that characterization. Look at all of the tweets referenced from kingbdogz regarding the warden, or the ones referenced in history sections from Jasper regarding texture changes. Sure, those were done "outside of their job" as you claim, but isn’t their job to also update people on development of the game? If I recall in one situation, Dinnerbone was planning on adding quivers to Java 1.9, but later said that they would be scrapped. The sources used for that information were through his Twitter account and only the account. No corresponding article, no YouTube video, just plain text for all the world to see.

I have removed the reference to the Minecraft Twitter on the Ancient Debris article. This will be your final warning regarding adding such references. Keep in mind that, again, the information was confirmed over a year prior to the article being created. You will be blocked from editing that page if the reference is added again. BDJP ^(t|c) 23:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I hope you don't mind, but I've removed your added models on the Camp-Page for now. I'll of course add them back later, but I think we should keep the Objects that are actual models and the ones that are just retextured blocks separate. Tables on Mobile can have some issues if images are differently sized, and I think, since unlike the Blocks the Prefab Decor items sometimes have actual In-Game Functions, (Redstone Relay, for example) we could make different table coloums. Just my opinion though. If you think we should keep it your way, feel free to reverse that change.

Hey, Sorry to bother you again, but I've noticed that you've added some items into the blocklist on the other MCD: Other Dimensions Decoration page. Are these official names? And if so, where do I find them? I want to add renders for them, but I can't find any files with those names. Was that perhaps released i na concept art or something? MatNXYT (talk) 00:14, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

To answer your reply for the piglin brute; very well then. Aaron526 (talk) 4:19, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from engaging in disruptive edits. Edits such as this, this, and this, only to be reverted moments later by the same editor, can be considered as spam editing and is wholly discouraged. Further disruptive editing may result in being blocked. BDJP ^(t|c) 20:58, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

I don't know if you'll see my reply at Minecraft Dungeons talk:Blaze Spawner but I wanted to let you know there's a proposal discussion taking place at Minecraft Wiki talk:Style guide#Capitalization tweak that includes lowercasing the names of ancient and boss mobs.

I observe that your point about encountering mobs once as a reason to treat them as proper nouns goes against existing precedent, in that the ender dragon is also encountered once in the base game, but not capitalized. The proposal under discussion is to make the guidelines consistent for mob names.

Different discussions may be needed to determine whether mob names such as "nameless one" is a proper noun or not, probably on a case-by-case basis. The way such terms like "chosen one" are treated in fantasy literature isn't consistent, but I would guess that such terms are mostly treated as proper nouns. Amatulic (talk) 20:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks to the mod creator, I got all the json files of mobs in version 1.15.10, which contains all the information of mobs properties, sound file list, effect rendering, etc. These files will solve almost all the mysteries of mobs, but I'm not going to share it publicly as I'm going to wait until this year's minecon is over. I plan to fully expand the zombie page first. Alan (talk) 15:53, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Just don’t remove anything though.Drour1234 () 00:48, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

I am pondering over the proposal to delete Minecraft Dungeons:Bubble Damage, Minecraft Dungeons:Reliable Ricochet, and Minecraft Dungeons:Toxic Trail. Are they hoaxes or actually part of the game? I'm writing to you because you are more knowledgeable than me about Minecraft Dungeons, which I don't play.

BTW I have responded to your query about the autopatrol right on my talk page. Amatulic (talk) 21:50, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Those are most likely fan made conjectures. In fact I'd go as far as to say almost all of the built in enchantments are made up. They were all made by PeetaKeeta (talk • contribs • logs • block log) a while back. Most of those are built-in modifiers rather than enchantments, especially the "reliable" ones. James Haydon (talk) 23:33, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

If that's the case, they are prohibited from being included as articles, per MCW:Wiki rules. Information about a modifier should be included in an article about the thing being modified.

Would you please go through PeetaKeeta's article creations and put the tag {{delete|Content does not exist in the game}} (or other appropriate reasoning like "subject isn't an enchantment") on the ones that are not actual game content? I will delete them. Amatulic (talk) 00:06, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Yes I will soon enough. Collector Alan has also taken issue with them and has been removing the fanmade enchantment icons form the pages. All of this happened while I was away from this wiki so it's a sudden discovery. James Haydon (talk) 00:28, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Actually the patroller in my language area told me that is fanmade. I originally planned to move the Fast Attack icon to the Chinese wiki, and the patroller told me do not completely trust the content of Dungeons in the English wiki, a lot of content is unprocessed and fabricated content. Well according to my observation, the main reason is that there are too few Dungeons players in the English wiki, and our Chinese wiki has a large number of wiki editors also Dungeons players, which is why we can have a complete Dungeons:API page, I try to shared these content to the English wiki, but I'm afraid I can't be babysitting all the time. Alan (talk) 01:59, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Anything fabricated, any speculation, any hoax, any fan-made content, any tutorial advice in articles, should be removed immediately. We need to be an information resource that is as "official" as possible. I'm surprised you say there are too few Dungeons players on the English Wiki. It seems to me that the Dungeons namespace is more active than the main article space. Amatulic (talk) 21:10, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

If you look closely at these Dungeons edit, you will find that most of them are due to fabrications or rumors, including page moves and merges, because there are too few Dungeons players to proof these content, so the Dungeons wiki is a gold mine… or blood donation center for me, Drour, James and Witheremperor. In fact, let me put it so bluntly that I might offend someone. English wiki lack the support of Dungeons technicians and mod creators, and we active editors are just a group of ordinary players who love Dungeons, and only know how to click on game files, unpack and do some simple animations. We seem to have a lot of power and speak right, but once we meet real technicians or modders, or pro players who have played more than a thousand hours, we are basic player. In addition, the content of Dungeoneers on discord is very substantial, but none of their mod creator seem to be wiki editors, or no longer like the game. Alan (talk) 05:10, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

I think me means that there are only very few active editors on the dungeons wiki (Me, Alan, Drour, and yourself to a minor extent). Everyone else is either IP's or accounts that only edit for a couple weeks or so before going on unknown hiatus. Due to the dependence on so few editors to keep such a large wiki maintained, there are bound to be errors and misinformation that get unnoticed as well as pages not getting updated with new info for months or generally looking unfinished (I.E. most of the pages about Cloudy Climb/Luminous Night related stuff). It also doesn't help that some well known Dungeons wiki editors (Hnaledi123, Oreli, Raybeano99) have gone completely silent in recent months, aside from Oreli who has had brief spurts of activity here and there. This wiki could maybe use some of those Chinese users if they knew English better since they can clearly check the game files and verify stuff very efficiently. Would appreciate your assistance in removing some of the more questionable/speculative content on this wiki. But to make sure you can do this, do you own Minecraft Dungeons? Or if so, any of the DLC packs? James Haydon (talk) 22:21, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

I don't play or own Minecraft Dungeons, because I am terrible at those kinds of games. While I have been active in the Dungeons pages and I have most of them in my watchlist, my editing activity on those pages has been restricted to grammar, spelling, formatting, and compliance with the style guide and content guidelines (like removing speculation, tutorial advice, and bad trivia). However, in my capacity here as an administrator, I can delete pages and images that don't belong, given that more knowledgeable trusted editors like you guys tag the pages so I know what to remove. Since I became an administrator I've been actively reducing the backlog of pages tagged for deletion, so if something needs deleting now, it likely won't languish for months or years like in the past. Amatulic (talk) 04:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Oops I think I may have been holding my draft for too long and accidentally overwritten everyone's replies. Well about Chinese players and editors, I can only say that both sides are not familiar with each other. And Chinese wikis are not obliged to share this information with other wikis. It is better to translate Chinese into English, just like other wikis translated English content into their own language 10 years ago. There is nothing I can do about the translation problem, and I have only been in contact with English for less than 2-3 years but I would do my best lol, . Anyways Dungeons have been fake death for so long. And the new game Legend is about to be released, I only worry about the future of Dungeons and whether it is worth our maintenance. Alan (talk) 03:09, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

In addition, there is a page about the Dungeons high-difficulty level tutorial. I also want to transfer it to the English wiki. In fact, this page has existed for more than a year, but the original author of the tutorial does not want to pay attention to foreign players... Well, he actually has a personality that discriminates against newbies. And treat foreign players as primitive people. However, this tutorial does allow players to easily pass the level of the Apocalypse 25+6 raid captains and daily mission.Alan (talk) 03:31, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

My question remains: should Minecraft Dungeons:Bubble Damage, Minecraft Dungeons:Reliable Ricochet, and Minecraft Dungeons:Toxic Trail be deleted? They are linked by several pages, including Template:Minecraft_Dungeons_enchantments under "built in enchantments". I can clean all of those up but I want confirmation that these subjects were invented out of thin air and not actually part of the game (that is, not represented by any internal game ID for enchantments). Amatulic (talk) 18:40, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Sorry for taking a while to respond. I am now certain that the three of them are made up and should be deleted.Drour1234 () 02:45, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll remove them then, after I remove all the links to them in other places. Amatulic (talk) 01:32, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Also while you're at it the same PeetaKeeta guy added a bunch of enchantment stuff to gear pages that doesn't apply (I.E. saying an armor has the sharpness enchantment because it increases melee damage by 30%, which is a modifier not an enchantment, or saying that the Harp Crossbow has "reliable multishot", even though it is also a modifier and not an enchantment.) and I think you need to go through all of them in source editor and check for any of those "enchantments" he added. James Haydon (talk) 02:32, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Here have a look through his contribution log to see all of his other creations/enchantment additions. James Haydon (talk) 02:33, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

I did delete those three that are the subject of this discussion, as well as the associated images, and all links to them in article pages (there was a lot of crosslinking too). For the other creations, if anything needs deleting, I don't know enough about the game, so I must rely on you guys to tag the pages that shouldn't be there. Amatulic (talk) 17:39, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

These three enchantments are built-in enchantments that are very obviously in the game. Other built-in exclusive enchantments have their own pages so why were these deleted? HMPilatus (talk) 19:19, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

We're in the process of deleting those pages too. They were all created by the same user, and they are properties, not enchantments. These ones got deleted because we unlinked them from all the pages they were linked to. Maybe you could help us remove links to those fake enchantments from pages so we can delete those pages from the wiki. James Haydon (talk) 21:38, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

You put this phrase on every enchantment page (I am aware I have aswell a bit, but that's just for consistency and since I knew you'd add it anyways) and I wanted to ask, why? It makes no sense and is incorrect. Enchantments have nothing to do with missions, they are not affected by what mission you're playing or anything like that. This phrase makes sense when put on artifact and gear pages, but not enchantments.

The phrase should just be changed to "(enchantment name) is an enchantment found on (type of gear) in Minecraft Dungeons" HMPilatus (talk) 19:29, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

I had only added the phase for consistency’s sake, you are correct about that. You also just brought up a good point that I had not thought about. I agree with you now that the phrase should be changed. Perhaps to: "that can be found within the various (type of gear) of Minecraft Dungeons." With that being said, however, I do think that we should both take a break from editing the wiki (This was actually why I have not been as active as I used to be). I do like the edits that you make for the most part, but you make way too many edits a day. You do not have to spend so much time editing on this wiki, though it is admirable. When you do make your edits to the various Enchantment pages, I recommend that you copy and save somewhere the template that I have marked in code in this message, if only to make editing a bit easier on you. I have specific reasons for using the word "Within" instead of "On". I hope all of this helps you in the future. Keep up the good work you do.Drour1234 () 19:52, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the kind reply, I will change the phrasing to what you've recommended, using 'within' instead of 'on'. I should probably take a break, but to be honest I don't have anything better to do as I'm young. I enjoy doing this so don't worry. Thank you for cleaning up after my edits, if there's anything I'm doing wrong or should be doing please tell me, I'm still new. Have a good day! HMPilatus (talk) 20:07, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Editing wikis can be enjoyable. I do agree with you on this. However, you will find that eventually other things may take precedence, as I have recently been experiencing in the last few years. For you, this may be soon or it may be in a long time from now. Regardless of when this will happen for you, having the mindset that you currently conveyed in your previous message will likely lead to scrolling through wiki notifications becoming a habitual routine. Now, with that being said, I am not trying to scare or intimidate you and I could be wrong as this all may never happen to you at all. However, this habitual routine is difficult to break away from. I can attest to this, having experienced (and still experience) this myself, as the mindset that you have conveyed in your previous message and frequent edits are eerily similar to that of my own. Again, I am not trying to scare you or discourage you from editing as your edits are tremendously beneficial, but still these are things to think about.Drour1234 () 20:41, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the concern, and don't worry I don't feel discouraged. The reason I've done so many edits in such a short time is probably because I only started recently, I won't be doing this many edits all the time of course. I have a lot of free time and I want to improve this wiki, partially because everyone in the MCD discord server complains this wiki is very innacurate, and because I feel like I'm helping with something. I understand I could get bored of this or I won't have time to do it in the future, but that doesn't bother me right now. I'm glad my edits are "tremendously beneficial", that's very encouraging haha. HMPilatus (talk) 21:33, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Veteran editor here, even I can agree the information here is quite tired and lacking at times. Best of luck to you for improving this wiki. James Haydon (talk) 21:47, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

why have you reverted my edit?--143.44.165.14 08:11, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

It was not relevant to SPECIFICALLY Minecraft Dungeons.Drour1234 () 10:30, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Yes, the sniffer is described as an ancient mob by official documents, however "Ancient" is a descriptor, meaning it describes a noun, not the name of the sniffer itself. And anyway, The sniffer is described as an "Ancient Mob" not just "Ancient" because there are other ancient things in the game, example, fossils, pot shards, ancient debris. Making ancient redirect to the sniffer would be like making "green" redirect to the creeper.

And that is why an “Ancient” page would have a focus on things besides mobs such as fossils, pot shards, and ancient debris. The page should exist, but since no one wants it to, then I must settle for it to redirect to the sniffer mob. However, I will not be reverting your edit. Though perhaps you could help me to convince others to allow the “Ancient” page to exist?Drour1234 () 05:11, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Stop removing objectgroups from the data values section. If you are unaware of what object groups are, then you should not be editing their section to remove them.SeaOfPixels (talk) 08:47, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Sub End City is not an optional side dungeon, like the Colossal Rampart Garrison / Gale Sanctum Inner / etc it is a required part of the End Wilds level, and should not have its own page. It was never in any way removed from the game, this is false information. You keep popping up again and again making bad edits based on false information that I have to undo, it's really annoying. Please stop. If you see something on one of the many Dungeons pages I've been working on that confuses you, chances are it's not a mistake. If you have a question about something, ask me on my talk page, do not make edits on things you do not understand. SeaOfPixels (talk) 02:13, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

I disagree. Just because it is not optional does not mean it does not deserve its own page.Drour1234 () 21:25, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

👁 Image
Your account has been blocked from editing the Dungeons namespace for three days. Your block log can be found here. If you think the block was made as a mistake and/or you think there are good reasons for you to be unblocked, you may discuss the block with administrators on your talk page here. However, if this is abused, your talk page access may be revoked as well. While you are blocked, please do not create any new accounts to edit with – this is called sock puppetry and in most cases, all accounts that were created by a registered account which is blocked, will be blocked indefinitely. Once this block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. Thank you. BDJP ^(t|c) 16:52, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

I think blocking me from the entire namespace was unnecessary. You could have just blocked me from the two relevant pages in question. Also, why did you revert my adjustment to the gallery sections?Drour1234 () 17:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Hiya! When you make a delete request using the delete template, please provide a reason for the delete request that clearly explains why the page or file should be deleted. If the file you're requesting the deletion of is a duplicate, please say in the deletion request which file it is a duplicate of. Otherwise, the admin deleting the file has to go and search for what it could be a duplicate of. - Harristic / Talk 👁 Image
18:20, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

I thought putting the reason in the edit summory would be enough, but I will put the reason in the template from now on.Drour1234 () 18:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Regarding one of the edits made in Template:Navbox Legends entities. Navboxes are not supposed to have broken sprites, since any problems with the navboxes will automatically be tagged on every single article as having problems. Either upload the missing sprites for the navbox, or remove the missing sprites from the navboxes. Delvin4519 (talk) 17:24, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, could you please explain as to why you reverted my edits on Bundle? As far as I'm aware, they're constructive and follow the rules and style guide closely. Jurta (talk) 20:30, 15 August 2024 (UTC) Jurta (talk) 20:30, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

I reverted your edits because the caption should match the image file description and/or name.Drour1234 () 20:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

I'm not sure where you got that idea, but that has never been the case. Captions should generally describe what is happening in the image in a formal manner, and not just be a complete copy-paste. Jurta (talk) 20:40, 15 August 2024 (UTC) Jurta (talk) 20:40, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

They do not need to be in a formal manner, but I agree that they need to describe what is happening in the image.Drour1234 () 21:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your attention to detail when adding images from tweets. However, as several editors have pointed out, please ensure that you’re downloading the highest resolution images available from Twitter before uploading them to the wiki. This will save others from having to redo the work.

To do this:

1. Click on the image in the tweet to enlarge it.
2. Right-click the enlarged image and select “Save As.”

If the tweet contains multiple images, click the first image and repeat the process for each image as you flip through in the gallery.

If you prefer using a tool consider using savetwitter.net.

Thank you! :) -BrianGLHF (talk) 21:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the detailed instructions. I will see if this is possible to do on my phone.Drour1234 () 07:33, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

You should use Image Max URL to get original (or close to original) resolution images from an image URL. --Ljcool2006 (talk) 07:58, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Do you own A&S? If so, (and is you have Windows) can you decrypt the pack for the animations and new models and stuff? If not, no worries, I just saw that you edited my page on it. 👁 Image
PhoenixAsh89 (talk) (contribs) 13:13, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Looking at the comment above, it seems that you have a phone. If you don't own a Windows, you don't have to respond to either of these comments. 👁 Image
PhoenixAsh89 (talk) (contribs) 13:14, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Hey there, I thought I'd inform you about double redirects (redirects targeting other redirects) which can occur when moving pages. Since you move pages a lot, these are bound to happen. Please make sure to check for any of these that might have been created when moving pages. Thanks! -~- Nerdyguy2000   Talk   Edits  00:49, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Why did you move these pages? There is too little information about the black widow spider, the Greek creeper, the arachne, the golden and mummy sheeps to give them separate pages, so it makes sense to combine all the spiders, creepers and sheep into one pages. Put everything back. Buzzilaa (talk) 16:02, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Those pages should be similar to the Well Wisher, Bedlam, and Enderall pages. The characters and mobs in the Mini-Series are based on various skin packs. Those pages you mentioned should be about the skins and their appearances in the Mini-Series and other media. The regular mobs don’t need separate pages just like how regular mobs in various novels do not get separate pages.Drour1234 () 16:12, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

I think an argument could be made for Mini-Series mobs being distinct in the same way movie mobs are, but ultimately there just isn't enough material. All the plot integral species are from existing DLC, the regular mobs are always just in the background. Realshow19 (talk) 17:03, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

yes, but unlike WellWisher and Enderall, who are full-fledged antagonists, there is not enough content for these mobs for individual pages. I think you and I are both right, we need to come to a compromise. Buzzilaa (talk) 16:26, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Again, the pages would also be about their appearances in other media like skin packs, specifically because the Mini-Series was made to promote them.Drour1234 () 17:05, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

On that note we should try to make more pages for machinimas soon, based off what I've seen that's where a bulk of their appearances as characters were. Realshow19 (talk) 17:10, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Agreed.Drour1234 () 18:39, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

I noticed your work on Steedle, and I was wondering if you knew how to make new pages and if so, tell me? 8.24.109.26 18:26, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Create an account. Whydeletemyaccs 00:43, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Oh my goodness, why so rude? IPs can create accounts if they want to and can. Please don't leave rude messages like that. -~- Nerdyguy2000   Talk   Edits  00:46, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Sorry! Whydeletemyaccs 00:52, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

It's ok... just, next time, well, you get the idea. Don't make the same mistake twice :) -~- Nerdyguy2000   Talk   Edits  00:56, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

The only rude thing I see about your statement is that you could have had the word “please” at the beginning, but this is just a nitpick and not worth criticizing over. The only reason you were able to respond to this IP user’s question before I was is because I was (and am) still pondering on how to efficiently respond to it and decide what words to use in such a response.Drour1234 () 15:03, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

I noticed that you have created a large number of redirects. However, some of them such as Code of conduct and Discos are unnecessary. Please stop creating such unnecessary redirects. Thank you! ––– Aed8814 (C | T) 20:20, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

The entire topic was actually purely disruptive. All it said was:

1.22 The End Update

1.23 Car Update

This clearly violates MCW:TALK as it does NOT fit anywhere inside the discussion page. Talk pages are SOLELY meant to discuss issues about the article. That's why talk pages with only disruptive topics have the following deletion summary:

Sole comments violate talk page guidelines

Placing anything else with the intent of disrupting the wiki MUST be reverted immediately, which I did. BigEarsQuake 2 (talk) 20:33, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Please undo the changes you made to various instances of "endersent dungeon". Endersent dungeon is the most common name used in the patch notes which is why it was prioritized, while "endersent sighting" is only used once. The patch notes are no longer online so I understand why you made this mistake, but please revert the changes. SeaOfPixels (talk) 19:02, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

The term "Endersent dungeon" is not the most common name. It was also only used once in the patch notes. The difference is that Endersent Sighting is capitalized while Endersent dungeon is not (both are only used once).Drour1234 () 19:11, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Capitalization difference is not grounds to change all instances, especially considering endersent dungeon is more easily understood by those looking for it. SeaOfPixels (talk) 19:13, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

That is why redirects exists. Capitalization shouldn’t be ignored.Drour1234 () 19:20, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

That doesn't make any sense, there was already a redirect for endersent sighting? All you've done is create a task where all instances need to be changes on the basis of your personal preference. SeaOfPixels (talk) 19:23, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Capitalization matters when it is the only difference between the two. Especially since both are only ever used once.Drour1234 () 19:31, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Hey, I noticed that when adding alt text to the descriptions of the Spongebob DLC promotional images, you have been linking every possible word. However, most of these links are completely unrelated to the content of the image. For example, linking "house" when referring to a Spongebob house leads to the unrelated Indev Starting House. I've gone through and fixed them but if you could avoid overlinking in the future, that would be appreciated. 👁 Image
GameCatastrophe (talk) 19:32, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

I will try to avoid it, bit it is a difficult habit to break. Thank you for letting me know.Drour1234 () 19:36, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Please do not use edit summaries for discussion, as that is edit warring. To explain the removal of the characters listed on the page, the two different font colors of the End Poem are not characters and, even if they are considered characters, should not be listed separately anyways. As for the other "characters", Jens Bergenstein is not a Minecraft character and having the ability to rename a sheep doesn't change that. The character Jack Torrance from The Shining is not a Minecraft character. Dennis is a character from A Minecraft Movie and having an offhand reference in the in-game title of a painting doesn't make it a Minecraft character. Toast is not a Minecraft character just as The Rabbit of Caerbannog and all other rabbit types aren't unique characters. And the generic face of a creeper on the Creebet painting is, in no possible way, considered a character. 👁 Image
GameCatastrophe (talk) 21:37, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi I'm kinda confused right now and want to clarify something. I misclicked on rollback button, undid my rollback with the summary of "misclick!!", then you undid both of my edits and said i unexplained reverted. I just want to make sure that you know i didn't do that on purpose at all, sorry for any confusion i may have caused you. (also sorry if this makes absolutely no sense, I am incredibly tired right now) 👁 Image
amethyst_hhh👁 Image
06:40, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for clarifying.Drour1234 () 06:42, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

No problem, and again sorry! 👁 Image
amethyst_hhh👁 Image
06:44, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

https://minecraft.wiki/w/Cape?diff=prev&diffonly=1&oldid=3543679

I have little idea what I'm looking at with these images; they need captions. Since you were the one that added them, I thought I would ask you to add them. Catscratcher07 (talk) 12:27, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://minecraft.wiki/w/User_talk:Drour1234?oldid=3544628"