VOOZH about

URL: https://minecraft.wiki/w/Talk:Java_Edition_pre-Classic

⇱ Talk:Java Edition pre-Classic – Minecraft Wiki


Talk:Java Edition pre-Classic

From Minecraft Wiki
Latest comment: 26 June 2025 by MostaKH70 in topic Pre-Classic seems to be ended on 0.0.11a
Jump to navigation Jump to search

why is rd-132211 not here?

[edit source]
Latest comment: 30 November 20242 comments2 people in discussion

rd-132211 is a pre-classic, is it not? TheAwesome98 (signed out) 13:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

rd-132211 is available in the launcher 92.53.21.29 17:01, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

New Pre-Classic Version

[edit source]
Latest comment: 30 November 20242 comments2 people in discussion

So just recently, I saw a new version in the 1.6.6.1 version of the launcher called rd-20090515 which obviously means May 15th, 2009. Any person please edit the version history to include the version if you can. --Ktoby (talk) 21:54, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

this version is actually a duplicate of rd-161348 in the launcher as attempting to play it will launch rd-161348 instead. 92.53.21.29 17:00, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Question

[edit source]
Latest comment: 2 July 20203 comments3 people in discussion

I'm actually wondering why Pre classic only lasted six days. My guess is that Notch decided to have Pre Classic last six days. Or maybe he just didn't have time--69.242.110.19 19:34, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Why was there only 2 blocks in rd-132211(Stone and Grass)?--JaxonMC (talk) 02:04, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
cause that was a test, it wasn't a full version Notch was gonna release TheAwesome98 (signed out) 13:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Answer To Above

[edit source]
Latest comment: 3 October 20132 comments2 people in discussion

The reason the development phase only lasted six days, is because that is how long it took for the game to be made good enough to be released to the public. –Preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.195.246.29 (talk) at 09:33, 7 September 2013 (UTC). Please sign your posts with ~~~~

Ahhh thanks I have been wondering why--69.242.110.19 20:53, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Rename from Pre-Classic to Cave Game?

[edit source]
Latest comment: 27 April 20166 comments5 people in discussion

Do you guys like the idea of renaming the Pre-Classic pages to "Cave Game" since that's what Notch originally called it? Screenbones (talk) 01:18, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

I think it should be called "Cave Game" Because it only has 2 blocks(Stone and Grass) and is a very old version--JaxonMC (talk) 02:08, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
There was actually 6 blocks (Cobblestone, Grass, Dirt, Stone, Wood Planks, and Saplings), not 2. 50.141.212.168 13:13, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
There was 2 blocks in the 2 oldest versions, and then they released 4 more blocks after that. --Alexster24 (talk) 13:08, 27 April 2016 (UTC)Alexster24
I don't think it should be called "Cave Game" because the game was given an official name (Minecraft: Order of the Stone) before it was replaced by Classic 50.141.212.168 21:30, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
I also agree this should remain "Pre-classic". It refers to more than simply the cave game era KnightMiner (t|c) 16:11, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

The usage of, origins of, and distinctions between the terms "Pre-classic" and "Classic"

[edit source]
Latest comment: 25 May 201911 comments5 people in discussion

#1: This sentence from the Pre-classic rd-132211 page seems a little "off" to me: "rd-132211 is a version of Pre-classic released on May 13, 2009".

I don't mind the term "pre-classic" as a versioning name, for example in page names or in table headers. But when talking about it in prose, using it as a proper noun, it makes it sound like "Pre-classic" was a thing at the time.

So it seems like, when we say "it was a version of Infdev", that makes sense. Infdev was what it was called in those days. But when we say "it was a version of Classic" ... it was never called Classic or Pre-classic until years later, so using it as if it were a proper noun like Infdev or Alpha or Beta sounds funny.

Why not just use it as a non-proper adjective, like, "rd-132211 is a pre-classic version released on May 13, 2009"? What do people think?

#2: It led me to think also, where did we first start using the terms "Pre-classic" and "Classic"? Obviously after the time period, right, but when?

#3: And what was the rationale saying, this part is classic, and this part is pre-classic?

Sealbudsman talk | contribs 22:15, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

When I wrote the pre-classic pages I didn't know whether to make it a proper noun or not so feel free to make the P lowercase. Also the page Classic was created on July 8, 2010, so sometime before Alpha is when "the classic version" started being used. – Nixinova 👁 Image
👁 Image
👁 Image
03:17, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
If you want a more descriptive way of saying, all pre-classic versions are betas and test of Classic 0.0.9a. The video "Cave game tech test" shows that this version is just a test. There is even an official way of saying. If you look at the Bedrock Edition game files, there is a trivia sentence "The first version of Minecraft is created in seven days." So "pre-classic" was never an official name. It was a phrase to distinguish it from classic. That is also why we previously use "Pre 0.0.9a", but it was removed for whatever reason. Skylord wars (talk) 04:03, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Well the first version of the pre-classic article said "Pre-classic is the name given to versions released before Classic" so it didn't have a name back then; also, the pre-classic page was created 3 years later than the other versions (March 29, 2013). – Nixinova 👁 Image
👁 Image
👁 Image
19:48, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
I don't know about "pre-Classic", but "Classic" dates to at least July 2010, not "years later". ディノ千?!? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 19:29, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
The first internet archive of the wiki (21/06/2009) called the classic and indev periods "pre-release alpha". – Nixinova 👁 Image
👁 Image
👁 Image
22:00, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Classic was actually called "Minecraft (Alpha)". This is used on the tigsource forum and minecraft.net. The term Classic was used when Alpha as released. Classic versions have a at the back, such as 0.0.11a. I believe it means alpha. You can actually call "pre-Classic" eras as "RubyDung era" or "Cave Game era" though they are considered to be Minecraft. We might need an official name soon. "Pre-classic" is only used on the wiki. Skylord wars (talk) 05:19, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Should this page be moved to "Java Edition pre-Classic" and all rd-versions of it as well? eg "Java Edition pre-Classic rd-20090515" – Nixinova 👁 Image
 👁 Image
20:07, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Since we appear to mean "things that came before Classic" in a more general sense, rather than something specifically named "Pre-Classic", I'd capitalize it as "pre-Classic" and therefore support the moves Nixinova proposes. Memetics talk | edits 07:47, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
👁 Image
 Moved. The old capitalisation may have been fine when the Java prefix wasn't there but now it's too obvious that the "Pre-classic" bit is trying to be an official title. – Nixinova 👁 Image
 👁 Image
20:57, 11 May 2019 (UTC)


Now that versions such as mc-161607 have been documented, the line between "Classic" and "pre-Classic" become blurrier. The mc-s were released privately; does this make them "Classic" versions"? What about versions before 0.0.11a which were still not released to the public. All we're going off here is the version number. – Nixinova 👁 Image
 👁 Image
03:35, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

no public versions

[edit source]
Latest comment: 30 November 20241 comment1 person in discussion

can you tell me why are pre-classic versions not publicly released 92.53.21.29 16:19, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Pre-Classic seems to be ended on 0.0.11a

[edit source]
Latest comment: 26 June 20251 comment1 person in discussion

I spent a time recently thinking about Minecraft old versions and today I want to discuss about Pre-Classic, I think Pre-Classic era ends at "0.0.11a" , I know, I know that 0.0.11a consider to be a classic version but hear me out

What was the rationale saying, this part is classic, and this part is pre-classic?

We know during the Alpha era all versions before Indev are called Classic, And in the 10th Anniversary we know for sure that 0.0.23_1 is a Classic version (classic.minecraft.net), So Survival Test is Classic and seems to be that Multiplayer Test is classic and Early Classic is definitely classic

Enough talking about Classic let's discuss what is Pre-Classic, Pre-classic is not official name, It's a name given by Minecraft Wiki community and is about the versions before Classic,

The versions that everyone agrees is rd-132211 to rd-161348

But I also believe that "private alpha testing" are Pre-Classic because it's the same versions that released in the same day with bug fixes and caves

I have a question how can we consider development phase without a single release! like what if we didn't have any archived of any of this versions that was not meant to be released to the public, How can we call it Cave Game without caves! And all this previous versions are like a development builds for 0.0.11a

That lead me to the complete version of Pre-Classic that released to the public "0.0.11a" that is the same version with the same world gen with bug fixes and a true public release that marked the end of this development phase

And starting with 0.0.12a the development of Early Classic begin added bedrock, water and lava, along with a world boundary and a new world generator.


"Making 0.0.11a Pre-Classic will give it more value, People like to play the last version of the development phases like a1.2.6, in-20100223, c0.30... 0.0.11a will be in this case the complete version for people to try out pre-classic plus the first Minecraft public released ever that why we celebrate 17 May for every year" MostaKH70 (talk) 15:22, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://minecraft.wiki/w/Talk:Java_Edition_pre-Classic?oldid=3422560"

Navigation menu